G
gfcoach
It seems to me that the compulsory routines are better suited to smaller, younger girls. That the routines were designed for smaller, younger girls.
I've noticed at meets, included state finals, that the older girls (11+) score lower than younger girls, and the top scores in those age groups is always lower than the top scores in ages 10 and below.
I don't think the "older" girls are any less skilled. Statistically - there should be equal distribution of high scores no matter what the age group.
Thoughts?
I've noticed at meets, included state finals, that the older girls (11+) score lower than younger girls, and the top scores in those age groups is always lower than the top scores in ages 10 and below.
I don't think the "older" girls are any less skilled. Statistically - there should be equal distribution of high scores no matter what the age group.
Thoughts?