The purpose of the handstand bridge in L4 is to prepare them for the front handspring in L5.
This may be true, but the "purpose" of the skill is not what's being judged.

Respectfully, Can you elaborate on HOW a handstand to bridge kickover prepares for FHS?? I'm not envisioning how this works towards progression you mention. I mean, other then the feet go up and behind the gymnast, FHS is a rapid tumbling skill, where this is a slow, controlled positioning movement. I don't see how the two skills are related. It's these little things that I find most interesting.
As Gympanda graciously posted above -- there ARE specific deductions. And the first four are exactly the SAME deductions as one would expect for a
bridge done exclusively.
(Handstand/Bridge) Failure to maintain arms next to ears & focus on hands. Up to 0.10
(Bridge) Failure to close (join) legs 0.10
(Bridge) Failure to push shoulders behind hands in bridging phase Up to 0.20
(Bridge) Failure to land with feet simultaneously 0.10
(kickover) Insufficient leg separation on back kick-over (less than 120°) Up to 0.20
In fact, there's one more -- failure to attain and hold vertical in handstand phase.
Again: Close (join legs), land with feet simultaneously. That's pretty clear, and specific to me.
A bridge is a bridge, regardless of it's progressive value.
It's either a bridge - done properly - or it's not. And Photo #1 above -- is NOT a bridge. It doesn't become a bridge until the gymnast straightens the legs, feet together, with shoulders pushed behind hands. The skill is not "Handstand to
Bridge-like Kick-Over", or handstand to back "flop-over" (most common). Photo 1 would be where the gymnasts would be mid-back walkover. A back-walkover, or partial back walkover, in the case - ins't the required skill. Even though it may progress to other skills like front/back walkover, or FHS, the judged L4 floor routine skill is still 'handstand-bridge-kickover'.
I agree there is no deduction for landing with legs slightly bent. In fact, it's preferred because the gymnast needs slightly bent legs to be able to push the shoulders back behind the hands without repositioning. If the gymnast has good shoulder flexability, then a push back (of any distance) isn't needed to finish the element in the desired position. Thus -- straight leg.
From what I can tell, there are few judged skills that have acceptable variations. This
may be one of them, but I don't think so. Ignoring what the element requires - aka. accepting the deduction - is of course is always an option.
AlexsGymmyMom, My DD is one of three on her team (of 40) that can do a controlled handstand to bridge kickover with legs & feet together. Her scores
definately reflect this ability. The girls that don't execute this skill, but do the rest of the L4 routine very well - score significantly LESS. Just my own observation. But in the end -- it's Always up the the coach, for the very reasons gymch34 mentioned. Please be sure to ask the coach before having your DD pratice any element differently as it may contradict her coaches long-term agenda. It's counter-productive to your DD to share your vision of "correct" with that of your coach. Your coaches view is always the correct one - even if you disagree.
