Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
She tested clean after the team final - the cold medication that lead to the positive test was given to her just a few hours before the AA event.This issue with the figure skater Valieva reminded me a lot of Raducan's situation in 2000. Does anyone remember why was the Romanian team allowed to keep their team medal and why was Raducan allowed to continue to compete?
If you haven’t seen the documentary Icarus, about the Russian doping scandal, I encourage you to see it as the things they did were mind boggling.
I wonder why they can't process samples more quickly - it seems the one in question was taken weeks ago.
Sha'Carri was American and the US banned her when she failed the drug test....when Valieva failed it the ROC committee initially said she was out and then reversed their own decision...It's like the fox guarding the hen house. Why Russia or their designees are allowed to police themselves is mind boggling...it's like making a criminal his own parole officer.Agreed @bookworm, I think Russia blew it's chances for possible reinstatement now.
And, putting my nurse's cap on, what will be the long term health effects of these drugs on this girl??
Also, why wasn't Sha'Carri Richardson allowed to run in the Summer Games, but Valieva can skate now? Both technically failed drug tests.
Also, why wasn't Sha'Carri Richardson allowed to run in the Summer Games, but Valieva can skate now? Both technically failed drug tests.
I think for this very reason there is discussion of raising the minimum age for Senior competition (i.e. Olympics) to 18 so the ROC will no longer get to pull this crap.Valieva being 15 means she is a "protected person" where the IOC deems that they don't have the power to say "no" or even will know if they are doing something against the rules.
It does seem quite unfair and it's possible that RoC knew the rule and also knew nothing would happen to Valieva because she is protected. With that precedent being set why wouldn't they or anyone else do that with all their athletes under 16 if all they care about is winning.
There are credible rumblings out that they are upping the senior age for figure skaters for the 2023-2024 season to 17. Should have been done sooner, but hopefully goes through. I believe that the IOC protected minor age is for under 16, so that would get rid of that issue for figure skating and all athletes would be liable if doping.I think for this very reason there is discussion of raising the minimum age for Senior competition (i.e. Olympics) to 18 so the ROC will no longer get to pull this crap.
And FWIW, I do think Valieva knew she was taking "something" that wasn't allowed because they had a story ready to go ...now whether she had any say or control is another issue but she's still a dirty athlete who shouldn't be allowed to compete.
It looks likely that if this accusation is founded (and I think it will be, the grandpa story is very fishy) that her coaches and trainers/doctors who are found to have provided the drug could be suspended or permanently banned from the sport. She may not face the same level of consequence, but suspending/banning professionals who give performance enhancing drugs to minors is going to protect them. IMO, they should go with the harshest consequence here and ban the professionals.The entire protected person rule needs to be re-evaluated because it isn't protecting youth from being given performance enhancing drugs it is just allowing them to compete under the guise of ignorance and increases the likelihood that they would be given something from a parent/coach/organization that values winning over all else.
Even with the senior age increasing it still encourages using PED as their are no consequences for doing so. Until their SR age they can train longer, harder, with less risk of injury, and then cycle off of the PED when it is time to compete.