Flyaway
Proud Parent
- Jun 1, 2014
- 1,380
- 3,403
...a gym would continue to move a gymnast up levels despite not showing proficiency? This question is not entirely hypothetical and I know completely none of my business. But I AM curious.
Little girl spotted at a level 5 meet. Her scores were low enough that I was curious and looked her up on mymeetscores.com.
She's done one year at each level.
Level 3 - AA average 32.9. Did not qualify to state.
Level 4 - AA average 30.2. Did not qualify to state (and perhaps technically did not reach a mobility score??)
Level 5 - AA average 30.3. Has not yet qualified to state.
She is in the youngest age group at each meet, so I'm guessing not older than 7-8.
Why? Why continually move her up each year? She's young, there's time... why the rush? I know, I know, scores don't tell the whole story. But when a child is consistently scoring under 31 at a meet, I feel like there must be some proficiency missing.
I'm not trying to be super critical. And again I know it's none of my business. So please don't think I'm picking on this little girl. I'm more just curious about the gym philosophy behind this. Different gym philosophies are so interesting to me. If this were a gymnast at our gym she most certainly would not be competing level 5 this year. So it makes me wonder what would cause a gym or coach to feel the progression is warranted. Thoughts?
Little girl spotted at a level 5 meet. Her scores were low enough that I was curious and looked her up on mymeetscores.com.
She's done one year at each level.
Level 3 - AA average 32.9. Did not qualify to state.
Level 4 - AA average 30.2. Did not qualify to state (and perhaps technically did not reach a mobility score??)
Level 5 - AA average 30.3. Has not yet qualified to state.
She is in the youngest age group at each meet, so I'm guessing not older than 7-8.
Why? Why continually move her up each year? She's young, there's time... why the rush? I know, I know, scores don't tell the whole story. But when a child is consistently scoring under 31 at a meet, I feel like there must be some proficiency missing.
I'm not trying to be super critical. And again I know it's none of my business. So please don't think I'm picking on this little girl. I'm more just curious about the gym philosophy behind this. Different gym philosophies are so interesting to me. If this were a gymnast at our gym she most certainly would not be competing level 5 this year. So it makes me wonder what would cause a gym or coach to feel the progression is warranted. Thoughts?