I don't have an issue with the girls just trying to get their qualifying scores or competing for feedback not being shown, but it feels a bit off that the young women verifying for international assignments could also opt out--they're senior athletes competing to represent their countries at events that will absolutely be broadcast. I also appreciate that USAG was trying to respect athlete autonomy and privacy, though. The question is where transparency and privacy should intersect, and who things are supposed to be transparent to--just the athletes in the system, or to anyone? I haven't been able to settle on an answer I like completely for the first question (although my first sentence tells me where I'm leaning), but the answer to the second I think really should be everyone. Having a system closed to outsiders is a large part of what created the problem. I also recognize that this is the first time they've tried anything like this--I'm sure it will be an evolving process.
Has anyone heard if USAG will be releasing scores for everyone from this meet? That seems like it would be a very large part of the transparency process as well.
Margz was awesome, and Carey looked great on floor and vault. Lots of potential from DiCello, McClain, and Bowers. I loved Davis' mount sequence, and Kenlin is a gorgeous beam worker. Hopefully more of the athletes will allow their videos to be released after the meet.