- Mar 18, 2016
- 351
- 563
How does your gym communicate information about class progressions and team track stuff to parents (and athletes, especially if they're old enough)?
Inspired by a post on the parent forum with a discussion about what to expect with a young child on a pre-competitive track and how gyms communicate progression info. I know a some parents are frustrated with the lack of communication from coaching staff, so I was curious to find out what coaches' (and others) experiences and practices are.
At the gym I coached at, we were not supposed to give any definitive answer if parents asked about their child's progression. If I thought a kid should move into the pre-competitive track, I would have to ask the coach in charge of the team development program first, to confirm that she agreed with my evaluation, and that there was space in the class.
The other thing is that at a young age, so much can change so quickly. Our pre-competitive progression was 1) general class for 4-5 year olds, 2) class for 4-6 year olds with skill requirements, 3) invite-only class for advanced 5-6 year olds, 4) pre-team, and 5) team. A child in the second or third class could easily be considered as a prospect for team, but many also wind up not showing the consistent skill development that is needed to move to the next class. So you don't want to create an expectation that the athlete will stay on the competitive track.
Inspired by a post on the parent forum with a discussion about what to expect with a young child on a pre-competitive track and how gyms communicate progression info. I know a some parents are frustrated with the lack of communication from coaching staff, so I was curious to find out what coaches' (and others) experiences and practices are.
At the gym I coached at, we were not supposed to give any definitive answer if parents asked about their child's progression. If I thought a kid should move into the pre-competitive track, I would have to ask the coach in charge of the team development program first, to confirm that she agreed with my evaluation, and that there was space in the class.
The other thing is that at a young age, so much can change so quickly. Our pre-competitive progression was 1) general class for 4-5 year olds, 2) class for 4-6 year olds with skill requirements, 3) invite-only class for advanced 5-6 year olds, 4) pre-team, and 5) team. A child in the second or third class could easily be considered as a prospect for team, but many also wind up not showing the consistent skill development that is needed to move to the next class. So you don't want to create an expectation that the athlete will stay on the competitive track.