SPX
Proud Parent
- May 5, 2014
- 73
- 92
I've vaguely known for a while that our gym has a parent booster club. I just found out that if a gymnast is on team, the gymnast's family is automatically a member of the booster club and required to pay an annual fee and a number of assessments that cover meet fees and coach travel and compensation for the meets and such. It also seems from the meeting minutes of said booster club that they have 501-3c legal issues. In the by-laws it states that if the booster dues and assessments are not paid the gymnast cannot compete. I have no problem paying the valid meet expenses to the host gym and USAG or whoever the governing organization is and coaching expenses but I don't want to put myself at risk by becoming a member of a non-profit that I know has legal/financial trouble. There does not seem to be any way to opt out of this except to leave the gym.
I am wondering how it is that the parent club can dictate who is and isn't allowed to compete on the gym's team (assuming the meet fees and coaching expenses are paid to the host gym and coaches). In short whose team is it, the gyms or the parents club's?
I'm also wondering how common mandatory booster membership is? why not make it optional? Heck if they didn't insist on membership, I'd probably even donate to support the gym as a whole.
Also, it seems that the mandatory nature of membership is contributing to the legal difficulty with the 501-3c status. It makes it difficult to argue that the booster club is a separate non-profit entity when they are so tightly enmeshed in the financials of a for profit gym.
At the moment I'm just curious as team is only a possibility. Thanks for your thoughts.
I am wondering how it is that the parent club can dictate who is and isn't allowed to compete on the gym's team (assuming the meet fees and coaching expenses are paid to the host gym and coaches). In short whose team is it, the gyms or the parents club's?
I'm also wondering how common mandatory booster membership is? why not make it optional? Heck if they didn't insist on membership, I'd probably even donate to support the gym as a whole.
Also, it seems that the mandatory nature of membership is contributing to the legal difficulty with the 501-3c status. It makes it difficult to argue that the booster club is a separate non-profit entity when they are so tightly enmeshed in the financials of a for profit gym.
At the moment I'm just curious as team is only a possibility. Thanks for your thoughts.