A
Anonymous (295c)
What are everyone’s thoughts/experiences with how a young athlete’s strength and muscularity relates to their skill acquisition and success in the sport?
I’ve always just assumed that kids who are really strong are at an advantage in gymnastics and will likely be able to do well if they are dedicated and put in the work. Additionally her coach told me when she first made team that typically kids with her kind of muscularity will get the skills quickly as they progress. However, my DD(about to be 6) just had her first meet and it was eye opening. She is unbelievably naturally strong and muscular and has really good body tension but she scored fairly low (low 34s) and while she can do some really cool strength stuff (rope climbs in pike, ugly press hand stand from sitting, multiple strict pull ups, etc) her skills don’t seem to be coming particularly fast. (No back walk over or BHS- she even struggles with kickovers; doesn’t hold handstands for more than a second or two etc).
Is this just an age thing where she is still developing body awareness and things will start to click with time and experience or is strength not a good metric for predicting gymnastics success and I should not assume her muscularity will make her go far in the sport?
I figured being so young it’s just developmental but watching the 5-6 year olds at her meet appear to effortlessly perform these skills made me doubt it just being an age thing. Her gym is fairly low hours for their early levels and we were at a meet in an area where I believe they train much more rigorously but still.
I’m not too worried about it; she’s loving the sport and found competing very exciting (albeit extremely nerve wracking) so I’m just sitting back and letting her do her thing but just thought some insight would be interesting. Big muscles and power not an automatic ticket to Olympic glory?
Last edited by a moderator: