- May 6, 2013
- 925
- 2,188
That makes sense.They appeared in the catalogues once US clubs started asking for them. I believe the really controversial club in question was the first one to start using SylviaP, and that set the tone.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That makes sense.They appeared in the catalogues once US clubs started asking for them. I believe the really controversial club in question was the first one to start using SylviaP, and that set the tone.
Americans are such followers.They appeared in the catalogues once US clubs started asking for them. I believe the really controversial club in question was the first one to start using SylviaP, and that set the tone.
JessSyd makes a good point too, Aussie gymnasts after about the age of 8 or so don’t tend to wear leotards to training. They love their crop tops and bike pants (I think referred to as sports bras and booty shorts at least in the dance world in the US). If you have a class of pre teens or teens, in ,lost cases 95% of gymnasts will be wearing crop tops and not leotards.
So yes, culturally we are much more comfortable with showing the back than we are with high cut stuff.
And here in the UK probably we're not so much, because we don't get much summer to have skin on display outside of the gym. I'm not entirely joking with that btw. I'd certainly never let my daughter wear a crop top, but it has become much more prevalent in the gym (weights / cardio) world over the last 5 years. So seems more 'normal' nowadays.
Crop tops are common in the US as well, especially in the summer, though many gyms ban anything but leos for safety purposes (claiming difficulty in spotting?) I think in general, It is not so much the revealing of the back but the fact that these types of styles make it nearly impossible to wear a bra without it looking ridiculous and are also unflattering for larger girls in general, sending a message that larger girls are not welcome. These styles also don't look comfortable to compete in, which just seems silly of you are wanting your gymnasts to do their best From a couple of replies, the Leo in question this season also had a more revealing front.JessSyd makes a good point too, Aussie gymnasts after about the age of 8 or so don’t tend to wear leotards to training. They love their crop tops and bike pants (I think referred to as sports bras and booty shorts at least in the dance world in the US). If you have a class of pre teens or teens, in ,lost cases 95% of gymnasts will be wearing crop tops and not leotards.
So yes, culturally we are much more comfortable with showing the back than we are with high cut stuff.
That is a very interesting cultural difference. 3 year olds wear crop tops here, no one bats an eyelid.
We happened to be watching womens college diving on the NCAA channel on weekend. Those suits are like thongs. OMG.....
They appeared in the catalogues once US clubs started asking for them. I believe the really controversial club in question was the first one to start using SylviaP, and that set the tone.
Americans are such followers.
a gymnast shouldn’t have to make a choice of being exposed or having to take a deduction for it.
the college gymnasts pull up their leos and then roll them under to make them even higher. I’ve seen it and have been told about it. So don’t blame the coaches, the gymnasts actually do like them that way.I’m not sure why some are choosing to blame the high cut of leos solely on men. There are several female college head coaches that I’m sure are responsible for the design of their team leotard.
I personally don’t think they should be cut that high. There were wardrobe malfunctions last year and in one case, a picture had to be removed after some noticed that the leo has slipped during a routine and was exposing the gymnast. I watched a college meet last year where a floor, a girl’s leo rode up on her and by the end of the routine, her entire right cheek was exposed. She didn’t correct it until the end because she didn’t want to be deducted, but I doubt that she was comfortable with exposing that might of her body. Even if she was, a gymnast shouldn’t have to make a choice of being exposed or having to take a deduction for it.
I am also not convinced that every college gymnast is comfortable with such a high cut leg and since it is a team leo, out of respect for those that may want to be more modest, they should take that into consideration. This isn’t an issue of “a girl should be able to wear what she wants” because these girls don’t get that choice.
I'm sure there are some who do, but I have a hard time believing it's a universal preference.the college gymnasts pull up their leos and then roll them under to make them even higher. I’ve seen it and have been told about it. So don’t blame the coaches, the gymnasts actually do like them that way.
ExactlyThis isn’t an issue of “a girl should be able to wear what she wants” because these girls don’t get that choice.
I am also not convinced that every college gymnast is comfortable with such a high cut leg and since it is a team leo, out of respect for those that may want to be more modest, they should take that into consideration. This isn’t an issue of “a girl should be able to wear what she wants” because these girls don’t get that choice.
Then you haven’t been around college gymnastics very much.I'm sure there are some who do, but I have a hard time believing it's a universal preference.
I’m not sure why some are choosing to blame the high cut of leos solely on men.