Not really interested in being too involved in this thread, and I wish topics could be cohesive without being broken up like this. But I understand the intent. Anyway, I just want to focus on the following, w/rto the discussion with superflipgirl:
I firmly believe you have positive intentions. My position is just different, for how to respond to the problem. And I will note - I have recently blocked some really ignorant people on social media who have commented against Simone. I just have no tolerance left for any of them, nor should any of it be tolerated. Do I believe some are racially motivated - sadly, yes. But I also think a majority of this garbage would still be prevalent if it was a white person or any other race. There are several aspects to it other than race. One is U.S. pride ("we have to win!") Another is total indifference toward athletes as people, which may have been fueled over the decades by so many poorly-behaved millionaire athletes in big team sports. And another is just ignorance of the dangers of gymnastics. Like she's just supposed to "suck it up" and somehow it will be fine, and not risk her life or future.
Anyway, my point goes back to this quote from you:
I don't know how else to interpret this quote other than to say, it seems like you are expecting even those who may be "color blind" to the issue, to still take extra steps to be constantly sensitive about all of the possible societal consequences of their words. And for now just take me personally out of the equation. But the following is really what I want to say, and I'll end here:
If we have to constantly ask people who ARE racially unbiased, to censor and limit themselves because of others, or because of the society - where is the end goal?? How can we ever reach any end goal?
I appreciate all of your words. I really do. Thank you for clarifying, and I appreciate that we are able to have a civilized discussion.
Call me a "snowflake" but I DO believe that there are some ways we should take extra steps to ensure that our words don't hurt others. As far as what you quoted from me, I don't necessarily expect people to ALWAYS take those steps, but rather consider the implications behind what they said and how some people could have construed them. I should have made this clearer, but my intention when I said "I don't want to make this about race, but..." was NOT to call out anyone in particular or accuse everyone who was critical towards Simone of being racist. Rather, it was a thought that came to my mind that I wanted to share, and hoped that people would simply just take into consideration.
I was in general infuriated with anyone who was criticizing Simone for her decision--that particular infuriation did not have anything to do with race or possible racial implications, but something I felt a personal connection to as a former gymnast who has struggled with anxiety and other mental health issues my entire life. I don't want to go into a discussion now about why it makes me enraged that ANYONE would criticize any aspect of Simone's decision to focus on her mental health, because we would be here all day. But just know, that everything I said was coming from a general infuriation of Simone's criticizers.
The reason I brought up the "race thing" was because I was hoping her criticizers (who again, I was mad at from a mental health perspective) would maybe consider why they felt that way towards her. Did I think EVERYONE who was criticizing her had racist implications? Absolutely not. But as someone who has come from a family and community that has STRONGLY prioritized and valued mental health care and openness about feelings, it made me really think about why anyone could criticize her for such a hard decision to make. And I think you make some good points about why people may feel that way that have nothing to do with race--i.e. the "we need to win" mentality. Her race, however, WAS a possible factor that came into my mind and I was hoping people would at least consider or examine when looking back at their criticisms of her decisions--why do they feel that way about the decision she made?
The problem that happens is when people (I'm not talking about you in particular FYI) become defensive and say that it was unnecessary to bring up race in the first place. That, for me, signals that they have a problem with considering how what they said may perpetuate harmful stereotypes. If someone really were to believe that Simone's race had nothing to do with their opinion, I would hope that they would respond along the lines of "I don't personally feel that way, and I wasn't considering her race in my criticisms of her. Can you tell me why it appears that way when I criticize her? Are there implications that I don't know about?"
I'm not saying that everyone has to take extra steps to be sensitive, as you point out--I don't believe that we constantly need to be walking on eggshells! However, I feel that when you critique someone's character or personal decisions--i.e., the decision Simone made which could not have been easy for her in the slightest--you do have to realize that other people--myself included-- may wonder why you're thinking that way. In that case, I am not criticizing you for not recognizing that there may be racial impact to your words in the first place, but rather that when I bring up an example of societal oppression, you accept that your words COULD have come across that way--especially when you are critiquing a woman for making a very personal decision that I do not think was worthy of any backlash in the first place.
I hope you can see where I am coming from. Remember, I don't mean any of these words towards you, but rather where my anger comes from regarding these criticisms in the first place!