Double doubles with flexed wrists--that's a statement. Who made that statement? I read back through all the posts and no one did.
Floor routines have more than double doubles in them... And who said it's ballet or ice skating???
Goodness, I am a gymnastics fan and I get it with both barrels for simply suggesting young gymnasts could have more artistry other than the pointed toes. Holy guacamole, this whole string made me like US gymnastics a little less today. But I will still do my zombie duties and bring my child and pay my hard earned money!
i regret that you're not understanding the point. and i certainly mean you NO offense.
the point is that artistry goes out the window, as i said, when the difficulty becomes so extreme that the gymnast and coach must make a decision. to go balls out with power and technique to successfully execute a skill or...well, there is no or. if the skill ends up looking less artistic then so be it. and if other elements, like dance, have to take a back seat to the successful completion of a HUGE skill or end skill then that's what will happen.
in the old days, for example and i repeat myself, the elites had 3 passes. 1 of them was very difficult. the other 2 not so much. but all 3 together were much more difficult than even what you see level 10's perform today. the point? there was a balance of difficulty with the artistry. and there was no need to throw anything more difficult because it got you nothing as the code had not expanded.
now we are like diving and trampoline. with this code you get tenths for skills that you do. like a Geinger. it's a D. you get 2 tenths for the D. every skill has a difficulty rating. it's called the "D" score when the Judges are done, there is 1 Judge who has 'added up' all that the athlete has done. and you will end up with a total, as example, with something like a 5.5.
then there is the "E" score. or execution/artistry. and let's say were at floor. the "E" score will be all about the dance/choreography/leaps/jumps etc; they nitpick this stuff to death. but what they see when they judge is easier for them to take deductions for 'artistry' than it is for difficulty. a good double layout, for example, is harder to take a deduction on if it is successfully completed. but a switch leg leap is easier to deduct because you can see 'subtle' flaws in execution.
in order to win the gymnast with the higher "D" score, all things being equal, will win the event. and when i say equal, this includes deficient artistry. and the reason i am presenting you on why this is is because that "D" score is more important. and in order to train and successfully complete the skills that total the "D" score, the gymnast and coach have to spend more time there. not on the switch leg leap. why is this? because the dance is easy compared to the "D" (and e and f and g and h and so on) because facing ANY dance move has less margin for error and the athlete doesn't have to be preoccupied with the daunting proposition of missing that dance move. maybe they roll an ankle.
but rolling an ankle is the least of our concerns in the grand scheme of things. you have to have a high total "D" score to be competitive and beat the field. if someone has perfect artistry, whatever that is, it is more likely than not that they will have NO difficulty. it's like i said previously...you can't have peace and freedom at the same time. peace being difficulty and liberty being artistry respectively.
what i'm trying to get you to understand is that, and in my example, facing down an "E" skill at the end of a routine will be light years ahead of any dancer performing their most difficult skill. and anywhere in their performance whether it be at the beginning or at the end. but even the dancer must have stamina to perfrom their most difficult 'whatever' at the conclusion of the number.
now, you used "Pas De Deu" as your example. understand that a gymnast would be relieved if that's all they had to do. and especially at the end of any routine. if you are in gymnastics with a competitive gymnast of your own, then you will have to come to understand this. you stated
"If it is something a professional dancer spent fifteen years learning, can most elite gymnasts learn it? No. If it's something basic that an average nine year old ballet dance student can master, should future elite gymnasts be able to figure it out (looong before they are doing 4-5 tumbling passes or doubles)? Yeah, probably.
you are missing the point. a gymnast WILL learn whatever took 15 years for a dancer to learn. and the gymnast doesn't have 15 years to learn it in. and then they have to learn mastery in 4 or 6 events. not just "Pas De Deu". so your own answer to that is incorrect. it is not "No". the gymnast WILL learn the Pas De Deus. and the point is that if that dance element is the very last that they will do going in to the corner of their last and 4th final pass the gymnast will perform the Pas De Deus without much of a thought. but at that point of the routine, the gymnast is thinking ahead to the last and final pass of double layout.