profmom
Proud Parent
- Nov 18, 2011
- 9,461
- 17,029
Aussie_coach, this strikes me as a product liability lawsuit waiting to happen. All that is needed is for an injury to occur to a sympathetic plaintiff in a US state with generous rules as to what constitutes an unreasonably dangerous product. (Tort law in the US is state-based.) Common law has the concept of "assumption of risk," but if the risk is not foreseeable to the ordinary reasonable person, it may not enable the company to get off the hook. Sure, most ordinary parents might be able to foresee a concussion or some kinds of injuries that could occur by using an AirTrack, but as folks with a lot of gym experience know, once an inexperienced kid is launching her/himself into the air and rotating, all bets are off.
Link Removed
Link Removed