SpunkyGymMom
Proud Parent
- Oct 4, 2018
- 15
- 74
My daughter is a 13 year old L7. She typically scores well and places high in competition, though she is definitely not on a fast track. She doesn’t have a ton of natural strength and power, but her form and technique are excellent. An injury prior to the season kept her from L8 this year, but she now has her L8 skills back and is starting some L9 upgrades.
I was talking recently to an acquaintance, someone who I’d consider to know more about gymnastics than me and certainly more about the gyms in our area. She insisted that I should be moving my daughter to a gym with a stronger upper-level optionals program. My acquaintance is correct in that my daughter’s gym doesn’t have many upper-level optionals (one training group of L8/L9; they’ve never had a L10). It’s a relatively new gym, and the majority of their gymnasts are compulsory, L6/7, or Xcel.
I am inclined to ignore this person’s advice because my daughter loves her gym. The environment is very positive and encouraging, and my daughter likes her coaches and teammates. She looks forward to practice and is happy when she comes home. As a parent, what more can you ask for, right? She has no dreams of college gymnastics or other lofty goals. She just wants to be at a gym where she can challenge herself and continue to learn new skills.
Am I right to disregard the advice from my acquaintance? Are there concerns with being in the first crop of a gym’s upper-level optionals? Is it concerning from a safety perspective if my daughter is one of the first they coach on advanced skills? To my knowledge, none of her coaches have much prior L9/L10 experience. For what it’s worth, they appear to be taking a slow and cautious approach with the newest skills (lots of drills, landing in the pit, etc.) Thanks for any perspectives you can share!
I was talking recently to an acquaintance, someone who I’d consider to know more about gymnastics than me and certainly more about the gyms in our area. She insisted that I should be moving my daughter to a gym with a stronger upper-level optionals program. My acquaintance is correct in that my daughter’s gym doesn’t have many upper-level optionals (one training group of L8/L9; they’ve never had a L10). It’s a relatively new gym, and the majority of their gymnasts are compulsory, L6/7, or Xcel.
I am inclined to ignore this person’s advice because my daughter loves her gym. The environment is very positive and encouraging, and my daughter likes her coaches and teammates. She looks forward to practice and is happy when she comes home. As a parent, what more can you ask for, right? She has no dreams of college gymnastics or other lofty goals. She just wants to be at a gym where she can challenge herself and continue to learn new skills.
Am I right to disregard the advice from my acquaintance? Are there concerns with being in the first crop of a gym’s upper-level optionals? Is it concerning from a safety perspective if my daughter is one of the first they coach on advanced skills? To my knowledge, none of her coaches have much prior L9/L10 experience. For what it’s worth, they appear to be taking a slow and cautious approach with the newest skills (lots of drills, landing in the pit, etc.) Thanks for any perspectives you can share!