Blackie6
Proud Parent
- Mar 1, 2007
- 1,279
- 249
My daughter had a sectional meet this weekend. While I can see she has improved since her first meet (remember the 5.8 on bars?) I am not sure how she made the 32 score for states. And yes we are very proud of her, but surprised. We even gave her the speech about "you know you may not make it this year, it's your first time trying, do your best anyway". I didn't think she did her routines better than the last meet, I even saw quite a few mistakes, yet the scores seemed a little too high. As a matter of fact I think everyone in that session made it to states except a few. In all honesty my daughter's best score of all 3 meets she was in was a 30.5 I recognized some of the judges from other meets and even recognized the "infamous" judge that gave my DD the 5.8 bars and know she is the one judge that usually does score my DD low even on her best event. Even she seemed generous on my DD's worst event, beam.
My question is, are there times when you feel like your DD did better and didn't have the scores and then sometimes been given a "gift"?
How consistant is the judging at meets?
My question is, are there times when you feel like your DD did better and didn't have the scores and then sometimes been given a "gift"?
How consistant is the judging at meets?