...and just like some of you child's school teachers have been more effective than others, so are some coaches. Some have more experience, some have more training, some have their hearts in it more than others, or some simply have a style that better suits one child or another.
As for controversy...it's a competitive sport, and that can bring out all sorts of emotions, positive and less positive. If another child does well at a meet and ours doesn't, there's gotta be a reason, right? [That's rhetorical and facetious.] The obsessive brain will search high and low for a reason. It's the judges showing favoritism, it's the "home team advantage", the sun got in her eyes!
Too often I've seen hours used as the excuse...I mean...explanation, as in, "oh, no wonder, they do X hours a week and we do half that." Heck, we see the same thing when the newspaper reports test scores in another country exceed our own--well of course, they spend 250 days in school and go Saturdays, too, while we're stuck at 180, right?
And it's our kids, and we care deeply about them, and we want the best for them. We seek out the best neighborhoods, the best schools, the best gyms, right? And no one complains about too few hours if they're winning. But it's an easy target if someone else is doing better. [I'm not speaking of anything I read here, btw, but rather stuff I've heard over some number of years hanging around gyms.] This sport can be a tremendously positive experience for the children, and the vast majority of families are friendly and supportive. But it IS a competitive sport...