- Mar 16, 2011
- 3,536
- 3,225
1) Can someone give me examples of B dismounts on beam for L9? My daughter's dismount is hurdling to her RO and then a full. Seems like she is struggling with that again. One coach said her problem is she is hurdling crooked. So she suggests doing a standing RO to full. My daughter said that's how she has always done that but since we switched gyms the new (or temporary) beam coach is tell her to hurdle. Another coach said she is twisting incorrectly (twisting her head and body before her feet? I am not sure if that is what he said) or she could be twisting the wrong direction. Her head coach says he's not having her do the full at the first meet but will have to reteach the full because she was taught incorrectly by her former coaches. Her trouble with this dismount just surfaced a week ago but her coach is confident she'll have it by her second meet. What is the deduction for not having this dismount? Is there another dismount to fulfill this B dismount requirement?
2). My daughter has a tuck 3/4 to a split jump feet perpendicular to the beam which I am told is a .2 bonus. First question, even though she has a negative split jump, when she does it in this combination, she barely gets a split. Landing perpendicular to the beam scares her. Is the deduction for not having an adequate split (and it is pretty inadequate) justify putting this in her routine? I am thinking she could get a .2 deduction for the inadequate split which negates the bonus and there is the potential of the fall.
Weeks go by and she is doing great with all her skills and then all of a sudden there is a problem again. And she is so hard on herself. Any thoughts and suggestions on the above would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.
2). My daughter has a tuck 3/4 to a split jump feet perpendicular to the beam which I am told is a .2 bonus. First question, even though she has a negative split jump, when she does it in this combination, she barely gets a split. Landing perpendicular to the beam scares her. Is the deduction for not having an adequate split (and it is pretty inadequate) justify putting this in her routine? I am thinking she could get a .2 deduction for the inadequate split which negates the bonus and there is the potential of the fall.
Weeks go by and she is doing great with all her skills and then all of a sudden there is a problem again. And she is so hard on herself. Any thoughts and suggestions on the above would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.