Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think this site would be much improved if everybody had to pay an exorbitant membership fee and those fees were then paid to the mods and admins.
...
Ok, in all seriousness, I have no complaints.
I agree with MaryA. I see both sides of the coin with that it could be good. Have some control, and keep things on track to a degree. But I know that some topics have gone completly off topic from start to finsih..but through out, it was on topic to a degree, it just changed a little bit each post then by the end it was nothing near what it started as. So where is that line at of where it is considered off topic? I by no means am a pot stirrer. Just concerend that it may (like MaryA said) cause people (probably me..lol) afraid to respond for fear of getting off topic with it.
I really do think this is a great site. I have learned alot on here. I hope it can get back to that friendly/family setting it was at when I came here 2 yrs ago.
PS..example just in personal life. I have started a covo with someone talking about Kindergarten and ended it with talking about elephants. Now, they have nothing in common..but through out that whole conversation, they did link into each other..slowly..lol
I think we'll need to discuss further what constitutes unacceptably off-topic and what is acceptable "topic drift." In some cases it's obvious, in others not so much.
-I would like to see more tolerance of alternative viewpoints. This will probably not make me popular but I still don't and never did understand why stretchsportsguy (or whatever it was) was banned. I think there is something to be learned and gained from discussion which embraces all viewpoints.
-The rules for banning members should be public (maybe they are?) and clearly spelled out.
-Mods/admins should not post snarky or condescending remarks.
-Posters whose main purpose in posting is to burst someone else's bubble, bring them back to reality, or otherwise explain to them why they are misled should consider refraining from posting. It alienates new members.
I like this place. I read here everyday. Sometimes I post, most days I don't. The future of cb I think depends on people remembering always that everyone is where they are, and you can only be a help by meeting them where they are. If you are too tired or too far along a different path to post with compassion for where the op is then don't.
[mod cap on]-I would like to see more tolerance of alternative viewpoints. This will probably not make me popular but I still don't and never did understand why stretchsportsguy (or whatever it was) was banned. I think there is something to be learned and gained from discussion which embraces all viewpoints.
Da Rules-The rules for banning members should be public (maybe they are?) and clearly spelled out.
-Mods/admins should not post snarky or condescending remarks.
-Posters whose main purpose in posting is to burst someone else's bubble, bring them back to reality, or otherwise explain to them why they are misled should consider refraining from posting. It alienates new members.
I like this place. I read here everyday. Sometimes I post, most days I don't. The future of cb I think depends on people remembering always that everyone is where they are, and you can only be a help by meeting them where they are. If you are too tired or too far along a different path to post with compassion for where the op is then don't.
-I .
-Posters whose main purpose in posting is to burst someone else's bubble, bring them back to reality, or otherwise explain to them why they are misled should consider refraining from posting. It alienates new members.
*********************************************************************************************
In reference to this...when someone starts a thread with "Do I have a chance at XXX (elite, TOPS, Olympics)etc"?, I think you do them a disservice to lie to them when you know otherwise. For example, there was a thread a while back where a poster asked if as a 16 yo Level 8 (maybe 9) gymnast, what were her chances at a D1 gymnastics scholarship, I think this warranted a truthful response....I don't think posters are trying to "burst bubbles" or alienate new members....