SignHere
Proud Parent
- Jul 11, 2011
- 518
- 485
I was talking with a friend of mine, I'll call her A. Her daughter is 11 years old, I'll call her B. B competed level 8 last season ( 1st season competing level 8) . B did NOT medal at States, or qualify to Regionals (we are in a pretty competitive region for B's age group in level 8) To my knowledge, B had a solid 34/35 AA season.
So, A tells me that B and her coach have made the decision to move her up to level 9. She has 10.0 start values on every event EXCEPT bars. A seems extremely happy that B is moving up to Level 9 and expects her to spend a few years there.
Am I too conservative? I would be fighting tooth and nail against putting my kid in this situation. What's the benefit to moving this child up to level 9 and putting her in competition where she's not even able to start at a 10 ?
What am I not seeing?
So, A tells me that B and her coach have made the decision to move her up to level 9. She has 10.0 start values on every event EXCEPT bars. A seems extremely happy that B is moving up to Level 9 and expects her to spend a few years there.
Am I too conservative? I would be fighting tooth and nail against putting my kid in this situation. What's the benefit to moving this child up to level 9 and putting her in competition where she's not even able to start at a 10 ?
What am I not seeing?