FlippinLilysMom
Proud Parent
- Jun 7, 2016
- 1,708
- 3,320
So making a verbal commitment at 13/14 years old to attend a certain college is borderline child abuse but letting a 13/14 year old actually GO to college is ok....got it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Oh yes, this. My kid gets so fired up whenever I say, just to check in with her, something to the effect of how is it going, etc, and that she quit anytime if you want to... Lol. She is like, “Mom, wtheck is your problem, I love this sport. This sport is the best thing ever, and you are crazy.”Therein lies a parenting paradox:
Lovingly, and fully, support our child’s interests and ambitions, yet with equal vigor, ensure that it is safe for our child to change their mind and walk away, at any time, if they want – and be fully supportive of this choice as well.
At first glance this approach may seem antithetical to “success”, yet ironically when a child knows they are truly empowered to walk away at any time, they tend to enjoy the sport / etc. much more.
I actually don’t approve of either. I would not say it is child abuse however, I would say it is a judgment issue. Even if a child is a savant, there are enough online classes or different types of classes at community colleges (where high schoolers do go to earn college credits) to keep them interested in learning and excelling for a few years. In today’s world, they can advance themselves SO much online, while still waiting a little longer to enter the college scene. I think that at age 15-16 actually works very well for both cases in terms of making a commitment where they will go. Which ironically is now when gymnasts can make a commitment.So making a verbal commitment at 13/14 years old to attend a certain college is borderline child abuse but letting a 13/14 year old actually GO to college is ok....got it.
That is a very obtuse reading of what has been shared here on both topics. Clearly opinions differ, but you have to be willing to recognize the nuances. It isn’t black-and-white.So making a verbal commitment at 13/14 years old to attend a certain college is borderline child abuse but letting a 13/14 year old actually GO to college is ok....got it.
So making a verbal commitment at 13/14 years old to attend a certain college is borderline child abuse but letting a 13/14 year old actually GO to college is ok....got it.
I think the big difference in this comparison is that the athlete is in peak form (usually if she is getting an offer at this age) at age 13 and hitting puberty can change things down the road, as can injuries etc so that by Junior year, she may not be the peak recruit she was at 13...versus the "genius" academic kid who is starting college courses at age 13 , and puberty and injuries (barring a head injury) aren't part of an expected group of variables that affect the child's intelligence by her Junior year in high school. This is an apples and oranges comparison to me btw.
Do you all feel the same about a 12 year old genius who finishes high school early to start college?!?
A Dutch boy recently(well, June 2018 so not that recent) graduated high school at age 8, started high school at age 6 (high school is usually 6 years here, instead of your 4)For context - this is possibly what @FlippinLilysMom is reacting to (a recent story in our local news):
Link Removed
Ya'll can decide for yourselves if this child is pushed beyond what they are intellectually/emotionally capable of right now. To me this is apples and oranges from the recruiting rule change debate.
(Personal note - a few years ago I had the pleasure of seeing this kiddo receive math instruction on many occasions. What a beautiful mind! It was truly awe-inspiring to see this special little boy and his math teacher work together. He's not much younger than my DS and at the time was receiving instruction slightly higher than my then middle schooler DD (who at the time was 2 grade levels accelerated in math). He was very much a "little boy" too .)
The funny thing is I posted my question before this story came out, I had no idea about thos boy when I asked my question.For context - this is possibly what @FlippinLilysMom is reacting to (a recent story in our local news):
Link Removed
Ya'll can decide for yourselves if this child is pushed beyond what they are intellectually/emotionally capable of right now. To me this is apples and oranges from the recruiting rule change debate.
(Personal note - a few years ago I had the pleasure of seeing this kiddo receive math instruction on many occasions. What a beautiful mind! It was truly awe-inspiring to see this special little boy and his math teacher work together. He's not much younger than my DS and at the time was receiving instruction slightly higher than my then middle schooler DD (who at the time was 2 grade levels accelerated in math). He was very much a "little boy" too .)
The funny thing is I posted my question before this story came out, I had no idea about thos boy when I asked my question.
Do you all feel the same about a 12 year old genius who finishes high school early to start college?!?
Actually, I am even more opposed to having a 12-year-old genius actually enroll in college full-time than I am to letting a 12-year-old commit to the college she will eventually attend when she is 17 or 18. And in my personal experience this is not an abstract question but a real issue.
They all verballed at the end of 8th grade when many were 14, four years away from college and three years away from when most students make that decision. They weren't kindergartners, but they weren't seniors either. But what did they actually do? As with all verbals, there is no binding commitment. They can be cut or cut their colleges. It's truly only a promise to work together and intention to try to make it work on both the college's and gymnast's part. Yes, there's a risk 8th graders may be emotionally hurt by what's to come in the next four years, but they also were put on the center of a bullseye
My personal concern is how this rule will impact rising juniors now and in the years to come. By setting a date relatively late (even if arguably at a great time), most recruiting will happen within a very narrow 1-2 month time period. Right now, recruiting spans at least 18 months or more and often as long as three seasons.
What if you are injured that season? What if you need to switch gyms? What if your family situation is not ideal for recruiting that summer? What if you have a sudden growth spurt? Will gymnasts from smaller gyms or challenging regions have an even more difficult time getting noticed? What if a college's top recruit sits on her offer (which she is entitled to do) for a few months, leaving others panicked about their need to pick something else?
I'd hate to have a bad few months hurt long-term opportunities.