- Apr 5, 2012
- 308
- 621
Such an interesting question with such a complicated dynamic. Here's my take on it-loyalty is earned, it should not ever be considered as a given and it should work both ways-if a gym wants us to be loyal to them, they should be loyal to the kids by treating them appropriately and understanding that parents know their kids best and might occasionally need 5 minutes of time to discuss something going on with their child. Great coaches who are good role models and really care about the kids, regardless of how many hours a week we spend with them inspires/earns loyalty. A program with an owner who charges reasonable and competitive rates while showing they care about the kids and the families and not just the money inspires/earns loyalty. On the flip side, a family who pays their tuition regularly and on time and has reasonable conversations about their child and their progress (seeking to understand and to be understood) should be able to reasonably expect some loyalty from the gym in regards to coaching and financial practices.
In a program like that, where you trust that all the people involved are working towards your child's best interests, there should be loyalty and I can see where families leaving because of a perceived slight over move-ups or a new gym opening would be upsetting to the gym involved, but if people leave and the coaches /owner then treat them badly and encourage the rest of the team to do so as well have shown that they never truly cared about those kids and didn't deserve the loyalty in the first place. A coach who feels it is OK to come out on the mat and belittle the kids does not deserve loyalty, and no matter how good the rest of the coaches are, if something wasn't done about that one coach, the gym would lose our loyalty, because not only does that show that the gym doesn't put the kids first, as others have mentioned, my loyalty is to my child first and foremost. So yes, loyalty from families to the gym is important, but so is the responsibility of the gym to the children. If something changes in the way the gym treats the families/children, then it makes sense that the loyalties of the families involved might change as well.
In a program like that, where you trust that all the people involved are working towards your child's best interests, there should be loyalty and I can see where families leaving because of a perceived slight over move-ups or a new gym opening would be upsetting to the gym involved, but if people leave and the coaches /owner then treat them badly and encourage the rest of the team to do so as well have shown that they never truly cared about those kids and didn't deserve the loyalty in the first place. A coach who feels it is OK to come out on the mat and belittle the kids does not deserve loyalty, and no matter how good the rest of the coaches are, if something wasn't done about that one coach, the gym would lose our loyalty, because not only does that show that the gym doesn't put the kids first, as others have mentioned, my loyalty is to my child first and foremost. So yes, loyalty from families to the gym is important, but so is the responsibility of the gym to the children. If something changes in the way the gym treats the families/children, then it makes sense that the loyalties of the families involved might change as well.