- Sep 4, 2009
- 2,519
- 4,727
They went with Gabby over Ashton because she is capable of doing vt and fx if needed.Wow! I suppose they went with Gabby because of 2012, but I think Ashton would have been a better choice.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They went with Gabby over Ashton because she is capable of doing vt and fx if needed.Wow! I suppose they went with Gabby because of 2012, but I think Ashton would have been a better choice.
I don't understand how naming the 3rd best gymnast in the USA on bars as of this weekend, who won the silver medal in the AA at worlds just 9 months ago is "totally policital". You really think Gabby's gymnastics had nothing to do with her being named? I can understand those who argue perhaps they would prefer another gymnast should have been named ahead of her, but "totally political" I don't get.
Great article, and Marta states it well. Basically the first 4 names were easy Simone, Aly, Laurie and Madison. Don't think anyone can seriously argue about the to 3 AA and reigning world champ and trials champ on bars as the choices. So when picking the 5th you have 2 main considerations - what is our weakest event and who could fill in an any event(to avoid having to add alternate at last minute or if someone got hurt in qualifying when it's too late to add alternate). Gabby is the only one who covers both those bases.Marta is quoted here as saying the final spot came down to a choice between Gabby or Ashton!
Link Removed
Dev camp leaves the ranch on the 16th and the Olympic team comes in on the 17th ... but that would have been pretty awesome if there was an opportunity for their paths to cross at the ranch!I'm curious about this... I heard this also, and remember that being the case last time, but there is a development camp there this week and the USAG calendar lists the Olympic Team camp as starting July 17. Link Removed
Anyone know? It sure would be fun for the girls who will be there for DC to be there at the same time as the Olympic team!
It wouldn't reflect well to have a young woman with a doll not on the team.
https://www.yahoo.com/style/gabby-douglas-gets-her-own-134942386.html
It wouldn't reflect well to have a young woman with a doll not on the team.
https://www.yahoo.com/style/gabby-douglas-gets-her-own-134942386.html
And things like this definitely contributed to how "useful" she is to USAG......cha ching!
All of the girls selected are going straight to the ranch, they will leave for Rio from there. So she will not be going back to Buckeye. And while personal coaches will be there, Martha is the one calling the shots. If the relationship between Gabby and coach is tense at all, I don't imagine it would be too difficult to ice him out altogether- whether that is initiated by Gabby or Martha.
.
Wow, I really feel for Ashton. The Olympic berth was in her fingertips. Sounds like it really came down to the fact that she doesn't compete 2 events. As the US field gets deeper and deeper I wonder if the days of true specialists in the Olympics have passed.
She had a stress fracture in her back a few years ago. Think the decision was made doing the pounding on fx and vt anymore wasn't worth the risk. I think she could have made the team as a 2 event only athlete, but would have to be the best on an event by far, like if Kocian didn't exist.Yeah - she was really close. Does anyone know why doesn't she do the other events? Is it injury related, or does she just not have the skill level to be competitive? I can see someone saying they don't want to do vault, but what is the issue w/ floor?
She had a stress fracture in her back a few years ago. Think the decision was made doing the pounding on fx and vt anymore wasn't worth the risk. I think she could have made the team as a 2 event only athlete, but would have to be the best on an event by far, like if Kocian didn't exist.
Yes, really depends on what the ultimate goal is. If olympics is the one and only goal, 4 events makes a gymnast astronomically more viable. If having the longest elite career possible is a goal - world championship and World Cup medals - (plus long term health), then I think backing off is a good decision for her, since it's easier to be chosen for those as a specialist.I also heard that she had backed off on floor and vault to "last" through Tokyo in 2020.....but she may want to rethink her strategy because the 2 events only are what really kept her from being a truly viable option. Kocian brought back her AA game big time and tipped the scales in her favor...she hadn't competed it since 2013, but got it ready in time for Nationals and Trials and it made all the difference in the world....as she and her family head off to Rio.
Ashton brings more to the team, perfectly valid argument. Gabby brings more negatives than positives, perfectly valid discussion. But saying Gabby's position on the team is totally and completely about politics, implying that her gymnastics adds absolutely nothing to the team, I don't agree with. She is still a world class gymnast and her gymnastics adds value to this team. Whether another gymnast would have added more value, or the negatives/baggage she brings offset that value, I can understand that discussion.Well we didn't take the 2nd best gymnast on vault and beam last time, and she didn't fall or look like she wanted to be anywhere but there....I do think it was totally political to name someone like her who seems more interested in her reality show ( both on the TV and off) , than being on her A game for the Olympics. I was told by a very reliable source that Douglas knew she didn't have to worry about trials....and if that isn't political, because it certainly isn't performance based, then I don't know what is...
I think her negatives, in terms of attitude and lack of consistency and drama, far outweigh her bar routine contribution...we could've gotten a lone (better) bar routine from Locklear without any of Gabby's baggage..