The reason for the “new age” concept that actions should be the focus of praise instead of traits, is actually quite interesting and powerful, IMHO. It is backed up by a lot of reasearch, and the net-net is that kids who receive feedback on their actions are MUCH more likely to work hard when faced with a challenging situation, whereas kids who are praised for their traits are much more likely to be complacent, believing that their capabilities are fixed.
Personally, I think the application to gymnastics is quite relevant. At some point *all* kids, even the most naturally talented ones, will struggle. Based on this research, one would infer that those who were taught that their own hard work is what matters will be able persevere through those challenging times. Those who were praised for their talent or other “fixed” traits will be more likely give up (because you can’t change those things, so why try?)
Gooogle “Carol Dweck” and read some of her work on growth mindset. The original research is about middle school girls and math, but the idea has much broader application. It sounds like a lot of people on this thread seem to have heard of the idea, but perhaps not the rationale behind it, and therefore think of it as mumbo jumbo. Alternatively perhaps people who think it’s mumbo jumbo believe that natural talent is far more important in gymnastics than hard work is. Either way, I respectfully disagree and think it’s quite powerful.
Oh and as for “good girl,” I think it’s fine, personally.
Personally, I think the application to gymnastics is quite relevant. At some point *all* kids, even the most naturally talented ones, will struggle. Based on this research, one would infer that those who were taught that their own hard work is what matters will be able persevere through those challenging times. Those who were praised for their talent or other “fixed” traits will be more likely give up (because you can’t change those things, so why try?)
Gooogle “Carol Dweck” and read some of her work on growth mindset. The original research is about middle school girls and math, but the idea has much broader application. It sounds like a lot of people on this thread seem to have heard of the idea, but perhaps not the rationale behind it, and therefore think of it as mumbo jumbo. Alternatively perhaps people who think it’s mumbo jumbo believe that natural talent is far more important in gymnastics than hard work is. Either way, I respectfully disagree and think it’s quite powerful.
Oh and as for “good girl,” I think it’s fine, personally.