B
Bobby
My DD wasn't actually in this comp but some of her friends from her former team were.
It was just a regular invitational, but there were a LOT of girls competing. (NDP) L1 was split into novice (training under 4 hrs pw) and open (training over 4 hrs pw). There was no division according to age.
Anyway, there was a 7 y/o who trains at the HPC representing her club in the novice L1 division. It seemed very unfair since she trains 6 hrs at the HPC plus also trains with her team at her club (no idea how many extra hrs on top of the 6 but obviously 2+) so she obviously should have competed 'open'.
It seemed awfully unfair to all present. Made worse by the fact she was one of the eldest competing against a bunch of 5 and 6 yos. And also because a couple of DD's friends were actually held back from increasing their training hrs until after the comp so they'd remain eligible to compete novice.
And actually she didn't do all that well anyway - I think she got a 6th place out of around 30 girls. But she still took ribbons/honours she wasn't eligible for.
My question is how does everyone think that situation should that have been handled?? Obviously ideally everyone is honest to start ... but what about when they're not??
There was some very disgruntled talk in the beginning about asking her to be disqualified, but thankfully (for the 7 yo who wasn't responsible for it) everyone just zipped it and let her carry on. There was some talk about lodging an objection afterwards, but really is that even possible afterwards? Is there a point?
I'm interested to know if that's highly unusual (one hopes) and how it should be dealt with do you think???
It was just a regular invitational, but there were a LOT of girls competing. (NDP) L1 was split into novice (training under 4 hrs pw) and open (training over 4 hrs pw). There was no division according to age.
Anyway, there was a 7 y/o who trains at the HPC representing her club in the novice L1 division. It seemed very unfair since she trains 6 hrs at the HPC plus also trains with her team at her club (no idea how many extra hrs on top of the 6 but obviously 2+) so she obviously should have competed 'open'.
It seemed awfully unfair to all present. Made worse by the fact she was one of the eldest competing against a bunch of 5 and 6 yos. And also because a couple of DD's friends were actually held back from increasing their training hrs until after the comp so they'd remain eligible to compete novice.
And actually she didn't do all that well anyway - I think she got a 6th place out of around 30 girls. But she still took ribbons/honours she wasn't eligible for.
My question is how does everyone think that situation should that have been handled?? Obviously ideally everyone is honest to start ... but what about when they're not??
There was some very disgruntled talk in the beginning about asking her to be disqualified, but thankfully (for the 7 yo who wasn't responsible for it) everyone just zipped it and let her carry on. There was some talk about lodging an objection afterwards, but really is that even possible afterwards? Is there a point?
I'm interested to know if that's highly unusual (one hopes) and how it should be dealt with do you think???