- Dec 22, 2013
- 763
- 1,013
This is so interesting to me.
Of note is that most of the people who said "Yes, we would do it again!" have children at the lower end of the hours/seriousness/level end of the spectrum. Most of the people who have said, "No!" have children at the higher end of the hours/seriousness/level end of the spectrum.
But..........
When someone posts on here about a 5 year old that shows promise and loves gymnastics and might be able to compete Xcel Silver next spring, you will see the majority of replies advising the mother to check out more serious gyms nearby and not to "waste" their time at a lower level program.
It's just interesting to me.
I vote yes, we'd do it again, but all my children have topped out about Level 6 or 7 and at fourteen hours a week or less. Even then, there were struggles with time management and body aches, but the good has outweighed the bad.
Of note is that most of the people who said "Yes, we would do it again!" have children at the lower end of the hours/seriousness/level end of the spectrum. Most of the people who have said, "No!" have children at the higher end of the hours/seriousness/level end of the spectrum.
But..........
When someone posts on here about a 5 year old that shows promise and loves gymnastics and might be able to compete Xcel Silver next spring, you will see the majority of replies advising the mother to check out more serious gyms nearby and not to "waste" their time at a lower level program.
It's just interesting to me.
I vote yes, we'd do it again, but all my children have topped out about Level 6 or 7 and at fourteen hours a week or less. Even then, there were struggles with time management and body aches, but the good has outweighed the bad.