Women judes/coaches - Question on deductions for falls

DON'T LURK... Join The Discussion!

Members see FEWER ads

Joined
Aug 22, 2008
Messages
4,918
Reaction score
5,285
Is there any difference in scoring between a gymnast who fights to save a skill, but falls anyway and one who just takes the fall without fighting? Does the one who works to save herself from the fall get more deductions for "the extra wobbles, etc? And vice versa, does a judge tend to deduct more from a gymnast who doesn't try to save it?
 
Not sure about elsewhere, but in the JO code, you can't take balance errors leading to a fall. So if a gymnast lands on beam and wiggles, wiggles, wiggles, fall, she looses no more than the one who falls for the wiggles. Of course, this doesn't count include deductions in the skill itself: bent legs, leg separation, ext.
 

New Posts

DON'T LURK... Join The Discussion!

Members see FEWER ads

College Gym News

Beam deductions

Hi everyone! I’m hoping to get some help understanding my deductions on beam. I’ve been watching my videos back, but I’m having trouble figuring out exactly where the judges are taking the most off. If anyone is willing to take a look and give me some feedback, I’d really appreciate it. I’m especially curious about execution deductions, rhythm/connection issues, and anything in my acro or dance that might be costing me. The judge started me at a 10 for this routine, and I got a 9.1





New Posts

Back