- Mar 16, 2011
- 3,536
- 3,225
The "preferred hand placement" thread made me think of this post. In my limited experience, I've noticed that there are coaches who go with the natural ability of a gymnast and/or I guess coaches that allow more "individuality" so to speak. And there are coaches that are very strict with how their gymnasts perform skills. For instance in vault, a gymnast naturally goes crooked or hurdles crooked. One gym (Gym A) allows this and merely moves the springboard to where the gymnast hurdles. The other gym (Gym B), takes pains to correct the crooked hurdle by introducing more drills. The gymnast in Gym A does not seem adversely affected both in scoring (she scores in the high 9s) or progressing (she is now training double layouts). In bars, a gymnast hits the low bar doing her giant and the next day, Gym A coach moves the low bar farther away. Now the gymnast does not hit the low bar and can perform giants (but now bails are a little difficult because the bars are far apart but somehow the gymnasts still eventually can do them). Gym B insists on keeping the low bar closer delaying the progress temporarily. On beam, Gym A goes with the positioning of both hand and feet used by the gymnast when she first performed bhs. Apparently, the hand and feet position was problematic in the gymnasts progression to bhs bhs. But then although in the minority, there gymnasts that have progressed successfully using this uncommon positioning.
It would seem to me that I certainly prefer the latter strategy and trying to do it "right" from the start. But the Gym A believes it is best to go with the gymnasts natural inclination of performing a skill and that the method of other gyms in "forcing" standards does not benefit all gymnasts. Is there a point where you as coaches stop forcing/trying to change the natural inclination of a gymnast to perform a skill and go forward with what they are more comfortable doing? What if after all your drills you cannot straighten the hurdle or the gymnast cannot do a giant with the closer bar setting, what do you do?
The examples stated above are higher optional level gymnasts. I am not passing judgement on an coaching strategy but more interested in looking at both sides, their pros and cons.
It would seem to me that I certainly prefer the latter strategy and trying to do it "right" from the start. But the Gym A believes it is best to go with the gymnasts natural inclination of performing a skill and that the method of other gyms in "forcing" standards does not benefit all gymnasts. Is there a point where you as coaches stop forcing/trying to change the natural inclination of a gymnast to perform a skill and go forward with what they are more comfortable doing? What if after all your drills you cannot straighten the hurdle or the gymnast cannot do a giant with the closer bar setting, what do you do?
The examples stated above are higher optional level gymnasts. I am not passing judgement on an coaching strategy but more interested in looking at both sides, their pros and cons.