- Sep 1, 2011
- 87
- 27
I've been trying to learn the UK system the last few months. I think I finally got half of it. I have a few questions in my little head still though...
After understanding it a bit more and our own experience, it doesn't seem like the system is very open to those older than seven if the child has hopes of being a high level gymnast, maybe not Olympics but still high level for the love of the sport. Granted competitions has in and out of age groups for different levels, the age limit is quite restricting for higher level, no? I might be wrong but I think Shawn Johnson became elite at the age of 13. So if she was British, she wouldn't have the chance of being an elite gymnast, right?
Between the coach/club and the age (in/out of age) limit on competition, can't kids like Alicia Sacramone be overlooked?
My dd started gym early but it was off and on for a few years due to our move from the US. She's now in a very nice program with high level coaches who is pushing her because they think she has the talent and motivation for elite but it took us a bit to find the right place. Dd's old gym couldn't give her the extra training day (no space) for the intermediate group and there was no way she could get into the development program because she was seven and they wanted kids younger than her in the program or have certain skills (e.g. baby giant) if they start later (seven).
Did we just get unlucky with our first gym or the UK system can be limiting? It seems like a child is restricted not only by age but the coach too. At the old gym dd was thought as good but nothing else, so not pushed to do much. But at the two other gyms we tried out at (have more national/international success) they wanted to give her the chance. In a way it seems like the US level is less stressful in this matter. You practice the level skills, go to meets and try to get the scores, and move up if the scores are good. Each child gets the same amount of hours of practice no matter if she's age 6 or 13 at level 4. While the coaches will probably push certain kids more than others, it just seems more fair in term of general progression.
I understand that later on, if the child goes the national grading (8-5) route that she can compete at espoir level and move to elite if she's skilled and motivated but I heard it can be difficult since elite girls train a lot more to begin with than national girls.
After understanding it a bit more and our own experience, it doesn't seem like the system is very open to those older than seven if the child has hopes of being a high level gymnast, maybe not Olympics but still high level for the love of the sport. Granted competitions has in and out of age groups for different levels, the age limit is quite restricting for higher level, no? I might be wrong but I think Shawn Johnson became elite at the age of 13. So if she was British, she wouldn't have the chance of being an elite gymnast, right?
Between the coach/club and the age (in/out of age) limit on competition, can't kids like Alicia Sacramone be overlooked?
My dd started gym early but it was off and on for a few years due to our move from the US. She's now in a very nice program with high level coaches who is pushing her because they think she has the talent and motivation for elite but it took us a bit to find the right place. Dd's old gym couldn't give her the extra training day (no space) for the intermediate group and there was no way she could get into the development program because she was seven and they wanted kids younger than her in the program or have certain skills (e.g. baby giant) if they start later (seven).
Did we just get unlucky with our first gym or the UK system can be limiting? It seems like a child is restricted not only by age but the coach too. At the old gym dd was thought as good but nothing else, so not pushed to do much. But at the two other gyms we tried out at (have more national/international success) they wanted to give her the chance. In a way it seems like the US level is less stressful in this matter. You practice the level skills, go to meets and try to get the scores, and move up if the scores are good. Each child gets the same amount of hours of practice no matter if she's age 6 or 13 at level 4. While the coaches will probably push certain kids more than others, it just seems more fair in term of general progression.
I understand that later on, if the child goes the national grading (8-5) route that she can compete at espoir level and move to elite if she's skilled and motivated but I heard it can be difficult since elite girls train a lot more to begin with than national girls.