I am curious if there is a hierarchy for testing or for running tests (or whatever the terminology is.) Isn't getting a test result more urgent in some cases than others?
Yes and no. Basic treatment is not altered due to test results (at this point).You are treated as if, until otherwise known. Much like a flu diagnosis it’s for tracking.
There are tests that treatment depends on the result, ie, amount of insulin based on a glucose result.
Where it does matter, like L&D (there are 2 patients involved) that testing is a priority. So in our hospital system those patients get the rapid test.I imagine that is the case in most places. But before any one contradicts. I truly don’t know about all places. Other facilities may prior differ based on their needs and population.
Here in our state all surgical patients must be tested. If your surgery is elective you must test negative. Emergency surgery is still done, the patients are still tested pre-op but results are not known post op for 3-7 days. These are not typical times, anywhere. Especially in a country where some states have a larger population then a lot of countries.
As this is a new virus, none of the testing has been fully validated, regarding accuracy and specifics. Which of course complicates things as the false positive and false negative rates are not known.. Rapid tests are not necessarily very accurate.
And volume drives turnaround time. As surges wane, turnaround times will shorten. These are not typical times.
PCR is the gold standard of viral testing. The rapid kits are are compared to that when validated. It’s a complex test requiring many hours to complete. When I had my fever, I had my test done at a facility that sent the specimen to a lab that does PCR (same with my husband). Getting the results took longer but I have more confidence in the result. I didn’t want just a test result. I wanted a result that was accurate.