- Mar 16, 2011
- 3,536
- 3,225
Do you think it is an advantage or disadvantage to be young for your grade in gymnastics? Coaches look at the graduation year but the ages of the girls vary. I know age mattered for my son when he played football in junior high and even fencing through high school. He played against larger, more developed and mature athletes. Some athletes were almost 2 yeas older (and a foot taller!). Some parents hold their children back and some parents put their children ahead creating a 2 year age gap in some instances.
There is a thread here that talked about college coaches looking for prepubescent gymnasts. But I too wondered if a slightly older gymnast may also have an advantage with regards to maturity, muscle development, polish, etc. I feel it is a general consensus that younger gymnasts can get skills more quickly, are lighter on their feet and tend to be stronger (i.e., thread on press to handstands and many other threads stating their daughter has now reached puberty and it seems to have adversely affected their gymnastics). But once these girls hit their senior year, is there any difference between say a 16 year old or 17 or 18 year old or even in some instances a 19 year old on a purely biological standpoint?
There is a thread here that talked about college coaches looking for prepubescent gymnasts. But I too wondered if a slightly older gymnast may also have an advantage with regards to maturity, muscle development, polish, etc. I feel it is a general consensus that younger gymnasts can get skills more quickly, are lighter on their feet and tend to be stronger (i.e., thread on press to handstands and many other threads stating their daughter has now reached puberty and it seems to have adversely affected their gymnastics). But once these girls hit their senior year, is there any difference between say a 16 year old or 17 or 18 year old or even in some instances a 19 year old on a purely biological standpoint?