- Jan 21, 2007
- 4,926
- 6,322
Generally and hypothetically, suppose a gym's coaches showed a pattern of abuse, and this was reported by a high number of athletes -- hypothetically let's say thirty or so athletes.
In such a situation, those coaches should permanently blacklisted from USAG in my opinion. Any gym that employed such a coach knowing about these allegations should be blacklisted as well, and any parent who would take their kid to such a gym would have to be out of their minds.
I would also want to see those coaches banned from any online gymnastics forums or social media groups in which they may be members.
If (still speaking generally and hypothetically) USAG were to pardon said coaches to return after taking an education course, this would sadly not be surprising given USAG's record. It would confirm that the culture hasn't changed, that USAG is not concerned with the welfare of children in its program, and that the best course of action would be to metaphorically burn USAG to the ground and allow a new organization with new leadership to rise in its place.
Education in positive coaching should not be treated as a remedial solution, but as a preemptive step. A coach with a demonstrated history of abuse over many years cannot be expected to change over the course of a 50-hour online course.
I hope that any parent or coach considering a gym would first google the gym's name. I also hope that if a gym had a history of abusive coaching, some reputable news organization (the OC Register, for example) would have reported on it in order to hold both the gym and USAG accountable.
In such a situation, those coaches should permanently blacklisted from USAG in my opinion. Any gym that employed such a coach knowing about these allegations should be blacklisted as well, and any parent who would take their kid to such a gym would have to be out of their minds.
I would also want to see those coaches banned from any online gymnastics forums or social media groups in which they may be members.
If (still speaking generally and hypothetically) USAG were to pardon said coaches to return after taking an education course, this would sadly not be surprising given USAG's record. It would confirm that the culture hasn't changed, that USAG is not concerned with the welfare of children in its program, and that the best course of action would be to metaphorically burn USAG to the ground and allow a new organization with new leadership to rise in its place.
Education in positive coaching should not be treated as a remedial solution, but as a preemptive step. A coach with a demonstrated history of abuse over many years cannot be expected to change over the course of a 50-hour online course.
I hope that any parent or coach considering a gym would first google the gym's name. I also hope that if a gym had a history of abusive coaching, some reputable news organization (the OC Register, for example) would have reported on it in order to hold both the gym and USAG accountable.
Last edited: