Wow, could we put a hold on the PC and flames?? The OP, who is new here by the way, (this is a very 'warm' welcome to the forum for sure) used 10 adjectives. (I think that's what are called. Words that are used to describe other things. If not, sorry Ms. Keller my English teacher, I
always told you I had trouble remembering all the parts of a sentence!) Out of the ten, seems like everyone was pretty hasty to jump on the one. I think that if people were to reread the post in the spirit that I believe it was written, they would find that word was not meant to have any more significance than any of the other 9. The bottom line appears to be that the OP has a child that is difficult for her to coach for a myriad of reasons. For the ones that posted helpful solutions, I'd say 'thanks', to the others I'd say 'relax' and give the OP the benefit of the doubt.
Sorry but from what I read (and reread) the OP clearly believes this child shouldn't be in gymnastics anymore. To me, any "adjectives" used are secondary to that fact. Honesty I'm not worked up about what was said, as much as the fact that the OP seems to have given up on this child who is 4 years old! To me, it is a part of a rec coach's job to make sure that each child has a chance to experience gymnastics as they are able to, regardless of talent. It just seems like the OP is writing this child off, which is probably the reason why so many posters have pointed out some of the really great reasons for this child to continue with the sport. Honestly my heart kinda breaks for this child, knowing that the coach doesn't think she belongs there.