Hi blantonnick
Well your case certainly fits in with the kind of athlete Arkaev was talking about.
"just looking for some better motivating factors throughout..."
Aside from doing trials, and inviting others to compete against, that are strong competitors (of course in an environment that simulates competitions as much as possible)..i dont know how much more you can do.
At the club i used to work, they would have the head state judge (this is in the US) or something like that...a really high level judge anyhow.. come and watch the elite kids and then give feedback to the coach. The fact that the gymnasts never even talked to the judge or were involved in the decision process of what they are doing, i think doesn't help to much. Overall i dont know how much the whole process helped aside from getting them into some 'presentation' mode. Then again 1 (out of 2) made it into he jnr National team soon after.
I think coaches should get their gymnasts more involved in the decision process of what they are doing...especially as they age (if you already don't, but somehow i have a feeling you do, correct me if i am wrong). At the end they are going to compete the stuff...if they like what they are doing cause they have helped structure it and realise it, then they will appreciate it more, and work harder at it.
Rereading your initial post... "anyone have any good ideas for the measuring/assessment of control competitions?" i guess
1- Comparison of environtments between test competition and to be actual competition. By doing trial meets in different environments you could establish what works and doesnt for your gymanst/s. Each one being potentially different.
2- Comparison of results between your gymnasts and the gymnasts they will be competing against (results from international comps like previous Jnr Europeans, Euros etc..) based on a trial meet. Run a trial meet, and compare the results in short.. how do they stack up. Would give a rough guess at least of what to excpet and to see were you/they are at in comparison.
3- Run several trial comps in a row, and asses results..do they get better between days or worse, or stay the same.. How does their fetigue effect them between doing an AA round, and next day doing EF (for things they have qualified). taking an average.
4- Get 3 judges to technically score them (since you can tell them the routine composition, and have 1 person as an A panel judge)..and then see how 3 different judges rank them (without other judges knowing what eachone gave..reducing bias and what not).
I would just like to make sure that you are not asking about how to make mock meets (or as you said whatever people call them) more of an compeitition training exercise, but rather as an assesment of current performance level?..
I hope i am reading the question right.
any of this of any value to you?