The Karolyis are extreme, yes, but they are simply a reflection of their culture and the ideas many hold in this sport. My background is more in ballet and believe me, the things ballerinas bodies are put through are the same and even worse because of the dominance of the Russian methodology. Consider that the thinnest of the gymnasts on the US team, with the possible exception of Liukin who is built more like a ballerina than a gymnast, would be fat compared to a ballerina of the same talent level. Is this wrong? Health-wise, probably. Talent-wise? I don't know if it is wrong, but it sure seems outmoded and outdated in gymnastics--just look at the poor showing of the Russians, Romanians, and other former Soviet-Bloc teams in this year's gymnastics. The sport has changed with the times, but many people in the sport haven't changed with it. With the sport turning increasingly towards a pure emphasis on tricks, strength, and power, the things the Russian methodolgy produced so well (both in gymnastics AND ballet) are not as important. It's still a valid methodology, but will it still be producing gold medalists 12 years from now? (Heck, even 4 years from know given the way the Olympics went) I put my daughters in this sport because I wanted an outlet for their energy and because I like that, unlike with dance, very young children can study it and still have fun (in the world of ballet, training before age 5 is highly frowned upon). Coming into their fourth year of study, turns out they aren't half bad. If by some unconceived of miracle (and no I am NOT a stage mom or one of those parents who has Olympic dreams for their children) they reach Elite, I would hesitate before sending them to the Karolyis. Whether they produced winners in the past or not, they aren't producing them anymore. The best training available does not seem to be in their gym. Do I think they should have such control over US gymnastics? Frankly, I think that's a moot point. Bela is old, he didn't present the US, himself, or the team well on television, and people far smarter than I seem to be realizing they should start looking elsewhere. Marta's always been more "behind-the-scenes", but if Bela's out, I'm sure she would be as well. I highly doubt the pair will have much control over US gymnastics in the years to come. Does that mean that the new game in town will be any better? Honestly, I hope so, but who knows. I'd say it's smart for us to start watching the Liukins and Johnson's coach more closely. Both are obviously talented coaches, both seem to have a different approach than Karolyis, and both are certainly younger. I wouldn't be surprised to see one of them (or another equally talented and sought after coach) to take the helm in the next few years.