twinmomma
Proud Parent
- Jun 13, 2013
- 1,237
- 2,269
As always, some clubs will take advantage. I think USAG needs to set hour limits or guidelines. It's tough when your 4 and 7 hour a week kids are going up against those that are doing same hours as compulsories. It's against the spirit of what XCEL is supposed to be for. And compulsory fall kids shouldn't be competing in XCEL in spring meets either. Unfair for the kids doing XCEL to have less hours, be more affordable, etc.
I totally agree. We made the decision to do Xcel this season a) because when DD was asked to be on team the L3's were well into learning their routines and it was discussed DD wouldn't compete until the back half of the season and we wanted her to have a full competitive season experience and not be singled out from her team; and b) DD had never competed in ANYTHING other than a season of soccer and we wanted something a little less pressure infused in order to have her decide if this was what she wanted, since she was extremely nervous about competing at all.
It's unfair for kids with little experience and fewer hours to compete against kids who are competing year round or simply using the Xcel season to prep for JO season.