M
mouey77
- Thread starter
- #61
I know some gyms will hold a younger kid back because they don't want to offer them higher hours until they are some age the owner/HC thinks is appropriate for going whatever hours they have their, say, L3s going. So maybe when they could compete L2, they have younger kids do L1, which they can do in 4 hours/week, and bump them straight to L3 which might train 8-12 hours/week, when they're closer to 8. I also know some parents will hold the littles back if their gym does 12 hours a week of L3 and they don't want their 6 or 7 year old doing that.
DD is on a limited hours Y team competing USAG this spring and they do little to no uptraining and most girls will start the season with some issues with their routine. It's also not usual for them to repeat what is now L3 & L4 so they have time to get it all with the time they have (though they usually do not need to repeat the L2 level because that can be trained in 2x a week). But the point is they move up without the skills, they can skip levels or repeat levels, based on what the coaches think their potential is for the next year.
That makes sense. I wouldn't want my 6 yr old doing 12 hrs/week. 8 is plenty for now. I think again this might be a regional thing as the gym seems to expect perfect form even at level 1 and that's why the progression is really slow. Maybe this will somehow pay off later?!