Women Jaegers, tkatchevs and geingers...OH MY

DON'T LURK... Join The Discussion!

Members see FEWER ads

For NCAA it is a sepcial requirement:
3.1 UNEVEN BAR SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS (.20 each taken off Start Value).
One element may fulfill more than one Special Requirement, unless specified
a. Minimum of two (2) bar changes.
b. Two (2) flight elements, minimum of two (2) different C’s OR a D and B (not to include dismount).
c. One element with longitudinal axis (LA) turn, minimum of “C” (not to include dismount).
Note: The JO Compositional requirement of “2 changes of direction” DOES NOT APPLY to NCAA
d. “C” dismount. If the following modification occurs: “C” dismount immediately preceded by same two A or B elements = .10 deduction (not .20).

For JO level 10 it is a compositional deduction of a flat 0.2
Thanks, learned something new! I thought NCAA used L10 rules.
 
My older dd only did jaegers. We are told that a jaeger, bail to handstand connected to something (before or after) and an “e” dismount is the most efficient level 10 bar routine...

My little one first learned a Ray (which is the toe on version of a tkatchev) and is now catching a jaeger... she will only learn a Gienger if she can’t uprise out of a Maloney (which is the toe on version of a Shaposh).
 

New Posts

DON'T LURK... Join The Discussion!

Members see FEWER ads

College Gym News

Beam deductions

Hi everyone! I’m hoping to get some help understanding my deductions on beam. I’ve been watching my videos back, but I’m having trouble figuring out exactly where the judges are taking the most off. If anyone is willing to take a look and give me some feedback, I’d really appreciate it. I’m especially curious about execution deductions, rhythm/connection issues, and anything in my acro or dance that might be costing me. The judge started me at a 10 for this routine, and I got a 9.1





New Posts

Back