Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
hisMy cautious attitude towards Liukin is shifting into negative territory: http://eng.gymnovosti.com/valeri-liukin-everyones-looking-for-someone-to-blame/. He gave this short statement to Russian media.
“The main reason for my resignation is the scandal with the doctor. Everyone is now looking for someone to blame even though I had nothing to do with the main [team] staff at the time”.
I do not think he has grasped the reason people are against him. His relation to the Nassar case is solely that Nassar sparked a sport-wide investigation into generally abusive and unsavoury practices. Whether or not you think it's fair, every wrong that coaches and gymnastics-affiliated individuals have done in the past are being discovered, scrutinised, and punished at the moment. Valeri's past is far from squeaky-clean, regardless of what he is like now, and without his initiation of a transparent conversation, he has gotten hammered. I'm not sure his position was ever tenable given how closely he was affiliated with the "old guard", but I do think he could have bowed out gracefully had he been more open. Clear conversation about his past practices vs. his present ones, an explanation of his ethos and methods as a coach, accepting past wrongs, and specifically outlining how and why he changed would have made a big difference to perceptions of him. Although I think he'd have to resign anyway, it would be primarily for association, not for his reprehensible approach, which I should think is preferable.
Although I personally think his strategies as a coach were totally unacceptable and correctly disqualified him from the NTC position, I would be open to hearing about how he has evolved. I do believe that people can change and that he is not an evil person. I believe all of you who interacted with him and liked him. He is nevertheless the product of an old system and it is sad, but perhaps unsurprising, that he has employed the baser aspects of that in coaching his gymnasts.
If this post is contradictory, it's because I'm still sorting out my complex feelings about all this. I am not totally on board with the "his past actions have little to do with his position as NTC", but I also disagree that he is an evil person who deserves no forgiveness. I don't think he's Geddert-level awful, but I think he's bad enough that he shouldn't have been NTC. I am reasonably sure that he has missed the point in why some people dislike him.
tl;dr you are all the unwilling subjects of my brain dump as I think through this
My cautious attitude towards Liukin is shifting into negative territory: http://eng.gymnovosti.com/valeri-liukin-everyones-looking-for-someone-to-blame/. He gave this short statement to Russian media.
“The main reason for my resignation is the scandal with the doctor. Everyone is now looking for someone to blame even though I had nothing to do with the main [team] staff at the time”.
Nicely stated @azara. I feel similarly to you.
@azara Your brain dump is significantly more well stated than anything I could have written and re-written many times! Thank you for your take on all sides of the issue.
Well now I see where his daughter's PR skills come from...apple doesn't fall far from the tree...
...as are so many problems in this world. Imagine how many we could solve if people could realize this. Great points, @azarait's not a black and white problem with a clear solution.
You have said this before and it’s downright silly. Nastia also won multiple World gold and silver medals, on 3 different events and in the AA, in the previous cycles code. There are many things to be critical of in regards to both Liukins, but Nastias gymnastics prowess is not one of them.Anyway I totally don’t get why some people are acting like him resigning is a huge loss. It’s not like he has some kind of magic touch for creating winners. Nastia was an extremely lucky fluke whose style happened to align perfectly with that year’s code..
I make my daughter eat healthy food, despite her desire to have some ice cream and her favorite junk food. I hope she would not write about me negatively in her diary when she grows up and post it online.
I make my daughter eat healthy food, despite her desire to have some ice cream and her favorite junk food. I hope she would not write about me negatively in her diary when she grows up and post it online.
Being sarcastic for affect/attention or do you truly believe that any adult who is aware of the abuse of a child should look the other way and ignore it because “it’s not my problem”?Personally I’d blame the police, the neighbor, the mailman, the milkman, and the paperboy. In fact, the mayor should’ve had more police. The governor should’ve given more funds to the mayor.
And where was NATO when this happened?
Leaving an anonymous sarcastic comment leaves it open to interpretation, so that’s why I asked the question about your intent. It seems a stretch to say it’s ‘over the line’ because you’re right — we don’t know each other and I have no idea where you’re coming from or what you believe in. Thanks for clarifying.What I was trying to show is that there are always things that could’ve been spotted and hindsight is 20/20. There’s plenty of blame to go around after the fact. The bad guy is still the bad guy and the others can try to do better. It doesn’t necessarily mean that people weren’t interested in helping or didn’t care. They just may not have seen it.
To imply that I would ever be ok with a child being hurt or an adult turning a blind eye is ridiculous if you know me. I’m the last one that would ever fail to act. I realize you may not know me but that’s a bit over the line.