raenndrops
Coach
- Oct 24, 2009
- 7,061
- 7,370
I just reread it. The placing where appropriate meant into new levels 1-3 or New level 4.So I went and found the document just so I know I'm not crazy. LOL!
I understand how the levels work then and now. This was the year that old four turned into new three. The judge was of brevet level and her coach was very experienced. No one was confused about the levels or in any way trying game the system, but the rules are not maybe bullet proof clear I would say.
A usag document stated if you were an old 1,2,3 or 4 the coach was to place them in a level that represents their skill competency. Dd competed old four the year prior and was placed in new level 5.
An old level five could do new four or five but could not jump directly to six assuming a 31 at old five.
An old level six could be in new five, six or seven assuming a 31 at old six.
A new six must have an old level 6 or new level 5 score of 31 or higher.
These rules only applied in the transition year as part of the transition plan. Now level 4 is the first level you must score out of.
Link Removed
It is the chart that shows where to place based on where they were.
Old Level 5 is clearly stated as the same as new L4... And from old L5, they could either compete New L4 (repeat) or New L5 (move up if mobility score was earned).
Therefore, the judge either misinterpreted or went based on what she saw during the practice.