- May 12, 2018
- 90
- 84
My newly turned five year old had her first level 2 meet. She came in next to last with a all around score of 25-26ish(can’t recall the exact score). She looked to be one of the youngest at the meet, if not the youngest. She was definitely the smallest kid competing in her level. Most kids in her age division (5-6) looked to be six. I know these scores aren’t good and I really don’t care too much about how she scores. She is in gymnastics to get her energy out and have fun. But, she was upset that she didn’t get a medal when several of her teammates did. Is it typical for first meet scores to be so low? She only trains four hours a week and I know some other level 2’s train a lot more. I thought she did good but her scores said otherwise. I obviously don’t understand the scores and what the judges are looking for. I personally was just happy that she remembered her routines as she was afraid that she was going to forget them. It seems like a big age difference between a newly turned five year old and some of her six, almost seven year old teammates and competitors. Anyone else have a kid who started young with low scores only to see drastic improvement with age? She has some natural athletic ability but I think she is missing a lot of the little details in her routines as she is five and those details aren’t important to her yet. I see these 5-6 year old superstars on the Facebook gymnastics pages but yet no one ever talks about poor scores, only the good ones. I’m wondering how many other kids start out where mine currently is.