- Mar 25, 2012
- 2,877
- 3,009
Restricting activities is an artificial prop. The argument for restrictions is to keep them from getting hurt, and to keep them on a track that will lead to upper level work. If a kid needs restrictions it becomes a chicken and egg conundrum, because kids who genuinely want to get to the upper levels with hopes of making it to the elite level won't want to do much besides go to the gym.
For them, it's enough to get to do gymnastics, so they don't need restrictions. Those kids that would feel they're missing a ski trip or skate party are probably going to end up as good gymnasts that had a great time in all respects, and they won't want much besides doing it all.... the parties, bungee jumping, alligator wrestling, and chainsaw juggling, all along with the gymnastics.
The point is the kids tend to make and observe rules, or not, in ways that reflect what they're hoping to get out of life. For a very few, the hope is to have a shot at the top level, and that's how they have fun..... at least for the time being.
For them, it's enough to get to do gymnastics, so they don't need restrictions. Those kids that would feel they're missing a ski trip or skate party are probably going to end up as good gymnasts that had a great time in all respects, and they won't want much besides doing it all.... the parties, bungee jumping, alligator wrestling, and chainsaw juggling, all along with the gymnastics.
The point is the kids tend to make and observe rules, or not, in ways that reflect what they're hoping to get out of life. For a very few, the hope is to have a shot at the top level, and that's how they have fun..... at least for the time being.