- Mar 29, 2017
- 312
- 179
If someone attempts a squat on and doesn't fully completed but continues routine by doing sole circle is there a deduction?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We have a L6 that does it purposely instead of a squat onWe had a girl do it this weekend (lv 7) and she scored pretty well. Has done it before also. (I think this is maybe why you asked)
That is what I am wonderingDoes anyone feel the judges deduct assuming you were not successful with a squat or stoop on?
It is allowed without deduction when the squat on does not go well, as long as they only make 1 circle. It is also a legitimate skill.Does anyone feel the judges deduct assuming you were not successful with a squat or stoop on?
We had a girl in L5 do it consistently last year. Was better than her squat on, and it was fun to see something different. For whatever reason, it drove her (borderline CG) Mom, a former gymnast, up a wall. Mom really wanted the squat on.We have a L6 that does it purposely instead of a squat on![]()
Well, a cast to handstand is what it takes to not get any angle deduction (in JO Optionals since it is not required in compulsories). There are no angle deductions AND a sole circle is a listed skill in the code of points (and it is a NAMED option in place of the squat on at least for L5 Compulsories).If a failed cast to hand stand takes a deduction why wouldn't a failed squat on take a deduction. Just one of those things that makes gymnastics interesting.
Well, a cast to handstand is what it takes to not get any angle deduction (in JO Optionals since it is not required in compulsories). There are no angle deductions AND a sole circle is a listed skill in the code of points (and it is a NAMED option in place of the squat on at least for L5 Compulsories).
If the gymnast fails on the squat on and FALLS, it is a fall deduction (0.5) as opposed to a low cast (failed cast handstand) deduction of up to 0.3.
Hope that helps.![]()
If a gymnast attempts the squat on, pauses or lifts the hands off, instead of falling does a sole circle instead? Yes, this will incur a rhythm deduction of up to 0.1.Does anyone feel the judges deduct assuming you were not successful with a squat or stoop on?
Sometimes, it is obvious. In those cases, there is the rhythm deduction. Sometimes, it isn't obvious. We have a L5 that has started to fall backwards on her squat on in practice... when she turns it into a sole circle, it doesnt LOOK like she was falling on the squat on, but that she was planning on the sole circle the whole time because the movement is fluid.That was all previously clear to me thanks for the reassurance.
As a previous posted stated its obvious when the athlete fails on the squat on and uses the sole circle. Personally it does not matter to me it is just one of those things that makes gymnastics interesting. Kind of like your post that there are options in compulsories. Another one of those things.
I'm confused -how do they get to the high bar to finish the routine if they do a sole circle instead?