Muddlethru
Proud Parent
- Mar 16, 2011
- 3,536
- 3,225
To reiterate, yes I agree rec classes bring in the bulk of a gym's income. However, in my daughtee's old gym, believe it or not it is not the case. So, I can only speak of what I've personally experienced. My daughtee's old gym had only one or two rec classes in the afternoon and maybe one in the morning, 6 days a week. The classes had no more than 10 gymnasts paying $350 for 16 one-hour classes (roughly four months). I am very familiar with the rec schedule because I looked into rec classes for my youngest daughter. See the math below:
three classes a day with say 10 students each for 6 days equals 180 (30 students X 6). Multiply that by $350 is $63,000 and divide that by 4 months brings the gym an income of only $15,750. Our team of say 55 at $400/month brings in an income of $22/month. I guess that explains why our ratio of team coach to team members is so high, And that many of our rec coaches have never even done gymnastics. Note the gym owners/head coaches are not business people. We did not even have a sign on our door, no advertising, etc. In contrast, I checked Chow's gym and he has what seems like 32 classes A DAY, 6 days a week. He appears to have a very selective team of 40. So clearly in this instance it is a no brainer, the rec classes are the bread and butter of the gym or even the sole money maker.
Actually, I don't know where this post is going and why I am even involved in the thread.:-D. I really could care less one way or the other because it does not even concern me. I guess it is just my argumentative side.
Sorry about typos: daughter's instead of daughtee's (hehehe), $22,000/month instead of $22/month, ratio of coach to gymnasts is low not high. Sometimes I feel like I argue about the craziest things. :cheeky: