How to implement it all though... sigh
Here is a good use for the money from the “Used-To-Be-A-Sponsor-Of-USAG” crowd:
Sponsor several multi-million dollar grants, with layered stages of implementation, for a team of child development experts to advise USOC / USAG on re-thinking how gymnastics coaches should be interacting with children.
It's a win-win situation:
Corporations that still have their hands "Dirty" from being associated with USAG can very publicly be part of the solution. From C-Suite perspective, the positive PR would be redemptive - especially if given the public stamp of approval by 2012 and 2016 Olympians.
Children / Athletes win by having a significantly improved training environment moving forward due to a team of child development experts setting the expectations for interactions.
USAG wins, because they can defer to a team of nationally recognized experts to guide them.
Coaches win, because everyone is not independently, in their own gym, trying to re-invent the wheel based on where they perceive the boundary lines to be.
Children / Athletes win by having a significantly improved training environment moving forward due to a team of child development experts setting the expectations for interactions.
USAG wins, because they can defer to a team of nationally recognized experts to guide them.
Coaches win, because everyone is not independently, in their own gym, trying to re-invent the wheel based on where they perceive the boundary lines to be.
With USAG seemingly hanging on by a thread at this point, I'm not sure USAG would have much to lose by trying this approach.
P&G, Kellogg's, AT & T, USAG, and USOC: Your move.