bluefeet
Coach/Proud Parent
- May 14, 2007
- 37
- 0
As president of our booster club, I'm getting ready to purchase new foam for our loose foam pit. This will be the first complete re-fill in years.
We actually have an "L" shaped pit, but for the sake of discussion we'll stick to 1/2 of the L.
The dimensions of this section are 8' wide, 16' long, and 5' deep. The bottom two feet of the pit is covered by tramp (leaving 3" between the tramp and the surface edge).
I've found on the net that the required number of foam squares is calculated as follows:
6" cubes - W x L x D x .70 x 8.00 = # of cubes
8" cubes - W x L x D x .70 x 3.37 = # of cubes
First Question: Do you know if the formula already takes into account perhaps an 'industry standard', the tramp space at the bottom of the pit? Would my depth in this equation be the physical 5' depth, or just the 3' that I need to fill on top of the tramp?
Second Question: I understand that it is ideal to have a slightly rounded filling on top. Regardless of the actual depth to use in this equation, would this resulting # of cubes provide for this rounding...or would you get extra?
------------------------------------------------------------
Types & Sizes of Foam: The foam I'm looking at comes in 6" cubes or 8" cubes. I've gotten a couple conflicting recommendations as to what is best to use.
I've heard that larger is better, creating more 'empty space' between cubes to better absorb the landings.
I've also heard that for smaller children, the smaller cubes are better to keep them from getting to the bottom too quickly (slipping through basically).
Our pit (like most I gather) is used by 1 year olds, and full grown competitive gymnasts. I guess it's not uncommon to have a mix of sizes to best accommodate the variety of shapes, sizes, and weights of the gymnasts.
Third Question: If a mix for us is a given, would you have any experience in guesstimating what this mix might be? 1/2 and 1/2? 60/40?
I've found the following descriptions of the product foam:
ex: CC44140...
...where the CC designates the Combustion Modified (flame retardant), the "44" being the Load Deflection Rate, and the "140" being the pounds per sq" (i.e. 1.40).
From the suppliers I've limited it down to, I have available:
CC33145 @ $0.91 (per 6")
CC44140 @ $1.00 (per 6")
CC44170 @ $1.19 (per 6")
We're of course talking about thousands of pieces of foam, so I'm wondering if you have an opinion regarding the LDI. If we were comparing the middle-of-the-road price to the "33" LDI cheaper product, would the differences be significant? I'm hearing answers to this question ranging between "better, safer, more comfortable" to a more simple suggestion regarding the durability of the product.
If it's strictly durability, we DO have a healthy future budget for annual top-offs. These immediate savings for the mass re-fill would be much better for us. Of course if it's more performance related, I would then lean toward the more expensive.
"pantpant" ...ok, I guess that covers it.
I really appreciate anyone with experience in loose foam building/restocking, sharing their experiences.
-Dave
Ps. I'm also open to supplier suggestions as well, if you have a recommendation.
We actually have an "L" shaped pit, but for the sake of discussion we'll stick to 1/2 of the L.
The dimensions of this section are 8' wide, 16' long, and 5' deep. The bottom two feet of the pit is covered by tramp (leaving 3" between the tramp and the surface edge).
I've found on the net that the required number of foam squares is calculated as follows:
6" cubes - W x L x D x .70 x 8.00 = # of cubes
8" cubes - W x L x D x .70 x 3.37 = # of cubes
First Question: Do you know if the formula already takes into account perhaps an 'industry standard', the tramp space at the bottom of the pit? Would my depth in this equation be the physical 5' depth, or just the 3' that I need to fill on top of the tramp?
Second Question: I understand that it is ideal to have a slightly rounded filling on top. Regardless of the actual depth to use in this equation, would this resulting # of cubes provide for this rounding...or would you get extra?
------------------------------------------------------------
Types & Sizes of Foam: The foam I'm looking at comes in 6" cubes or 8" cubes. I've gotten a couple conflicting recommendations as to what is best to use.
I've heard that larger is better, creating more 'empty space' between cubes to better absorb the landings.
I've also heard that for smaller children, the smaller cubes are better to keep them from getting to the bottom too quickly (slipping through basically).
Our pit (like most I gather) is used by 1 year olds, and full grown competitive gymnasts. I guess it's not uncommon to have a mix of sizes to best accommodate the variety of shapes, sizes, and weights of the gymnasts.
Third Question: If a mix for us is a given, would you have any experience in guesstimating what this mix might be? 1/2 and 1/2? 60/40?
I've found the following descriptions of the product foam:
ex: CC44140...
...where the CC designates the Combustion Modified (flame retardant), the "44" being the Load Deflection Rate, and the "140" being the pounds per sq" (i.e. 1.40).
From the suppliers I've limited it down to, I have available:
CC33145 @ $0.91 (per 6")
CC44140 @ $1.00 (per 6")
CC44170 @ $1.19 (per 6")
We're of course talking about thousands of pieces of foam, so I'm wondering if you have an opinion regarding the LDI. If we were comparing the middle-of-the-road price to the "33" LDI cheaper product, would the differences be significant? I'm hearing answers to this question ranging between "better, safer, more comfortable" to a more simple suggestion regarding the durability of the product.
If it's strictly durability, we DO have a healthy future budget for annual top-offs. These immediate savings for the mass re-fill would be much better for us. Of course if it's more performance related, I would then lean toward the more expensive.
"pantpant" ...ok, I guess that covers it.
I really appreciate anyone with experience in loose foam building/restocking, sharing their experiences.
-Dave
Ps. I'm also open to supplier suggestions as well, if you have a recommendation.
Last edited: