profmom
Proud Parent
- Nov 18, 2011
- 9,461
- 17,029
Maybe I am just mis-remembering the early fall adventures last year, but it seems to me, as a casual observer, that the jump for the boys from 5-6 is bigger than the jump from 4-5. In my son's group of guys who competed L5 last year, I think everyone is missing at least one major element for one base L6 routine, and several of the guys who did pretty darn well at L5 on some events are having a hard time on the same events at L6.
What prompts the question is that we've now heard two different stories about how they will determine moveups: one is "no one moves up without being able to do full bonuses on all events at L5," and the other is "no one moves up without having or being within spitting distance of all base routines at L6." I hasten to add that either way seems to have a sound logic supporting it, and I don't have any stake in what they do with DS. But what's interesting is that the two standards don't correlate as well as I would have thought. Having full L5 bonuses doesn't necessarily predict capacity to do base L6 routines, and on floor (for instance), some guys who don't have all the L5 bonuses (endo roll, I'm looking at you!) can do L6 routines.
So is 6 that much harder than 5?
What prompts the question is that we've now heard two different stories about how they will determine moveups: one is "no one moves up without being able to do full bonuses on all events at L5," and the other is "no one moves up without having or being within spitting distance of all base routines at L6." I hasten to add that either way seems to have a sound logic supporting it, and I don't have any stake in what they do with DS. But what's interesting is that the two standards don't correlate as well as I would have thought. Having full L5 bonuses doesn't necessarily predict capacity to do base L6 routines, and on floor (for instance), some guys who don't have all the L5 bonuses (endo roll, I'm looking at you!) can do L6 routines.
So is 6 that much harder than 5?