My daughter competed old level 4 last year and moved up to the new level 4 this year. She almost has her kip, almost her double back hand spring, and absolutely loves the new routines. She probably falls within the middle 50% of her skills ability with the other girls, some skills better, other skills worse. She is very happy, cheerful, and go with the flow--hardly cries about gym and never comes home bummed out by any of it. She loves it!
Just tonight her coach came over and mentioned that it might be better for my daughter's confidence level if she were to keep training level 4, but compete level 3. I have never heard of this before! Why would she train really hard to learn new skills but compete on a lower level? She never complains or gets sad about her scores when they are low and she really is easy going about the whole thing--I don't get why the coach would say this and trying to get more out of the coach about it in the time we had to talk didn't produce much aside from "it might be better for her confidence level".
Is this a common thing to do? Why not just compete level 4 and give it your all? I don't get it...
Just tonight her coach came over and mentioned that it might be better for my daughter's confidence level if she were to keep training level 4, but compete level 3. I have never heard of this before! Why would she train really hard to learn new skills but compete on a lower level? She never complains or gets sad about her scores when they are low and she really is easy going about the whole thing--I don't get why the coach would say this and trying to get more out of the coach about it in the time we had to talk didn't produce much aside from "it might be better for her confidence level".
Is this a common thing to do? Why not just compete level 4 and give it your all? I don't get it...