D
Deleted member 14190
because it's all about the yurchenko. But! now that the NCAA is devaluing the Chenko Full, we will see what happens.Does anyone know why the U.S. doesn't take this approach?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
because it's all about the yurchenko. But! now that the NCAA is devaluing the Chenko Full, we will see what happens.Does anyone know why the U.S. doesn't take this approach?
because it's all about the yurchenko. But! now that the NCAA is devaluing the Chenko Full, we will see what happens.
because it's all about the yurchenko. But! now that the NCAA is devaluing the Chenko Full, we will see what happens.
because it's all about the yurchenko. But! now that the NCAA is devaluing the Chenko Full, we will see what happens.
I remember on another thread a coach commented that timers aren't competed because during a really good timer a gymnast should already begin rotating well before landing and would land on their back. Any other way would be coaching bad habits. That stuck with me because I had that same question you do.So I think I've asked this before--but why don't they do a Yurchenko timer in L8? I think I have seen this in a video of a Canadian competition.
Who knows .. Should be in level 7. But watching how they judge handsprings (which are handspring front timers) I don't think it's advisable....So I think I've asked this before--but why don't they do a Yurchenko timer in L8? I think I have seen this in a video of a Canadian competition.
My dd is competing Level 8 this season, so this thread really interests me. My question is about "voided" vaults. I have seen many Level 8 meets, and have seen quite a few girls land on their hands and knees. They typically received scores 7-8.25, not 0. I have actually never seen a zero score yet. Ever. How does someone receive a zero? I thought there was a courtesy score of 1? Maybe I'm misunderstanding.
Thank goodness at our gym, the girls do timers and practice vaults leading up to Yurchenkos for 3/4 years before competing them. Mine is doing piked Yurchenko, and I'm not worried at all. May not be a perfect vault, but will be completely safe! I do agree seeing girls flip vaults who are not ready is scary !
Well you can do 2 vaults still so I would imagine a lot of people including myself will be doing the same, unless they hit that first vault. I really don't see this as a big change, except everybody is going to blame the coach if the kids trashes the second vault from here on out.... I see this rule creating nothing but problems in the parent/coach area...
= It would be nice to see level 10 offer a second vault only if it was a different family and the highest score counts. But again, too many injuries will be the main reason why they won't. Soooo, the shortest event just got shorter.Yes...stupid rule...just pick a number...everyone does 1 or everyone does 2.
Or do something real...2nd vault only from a different family for bonus!
I remember on another thread a coach commented that timers aren't competed because during a really good timer a gymnast should already begin rotating well before landing and would land on their back. Any other way would be coaching bad habits. That stuck with me because I had that same question you do.
This is what Jenny means, these are some of our vault prep vaultsno reason you can't compete a timer to back on a mat stack
That video of sky gymnastics that is not level 3 she did a half on!
Alright guys, edumacate me...what the heck is a timer?
I have seen my share of scary level 8 vaults - including my own dd, even after vaulting a tsuk for over a year she had some scary moments last season where I was so grateful to the coach who caught her in warmups. Never been so happy to see my dd scratch an event. I like the changes.